Fortunately, I don’t think the judge will ask them to do that.

I just wanted to avoid linking directly to LinkedIn, since I think people would rather avoid visiting it for various reasons. I prefer linking to archives though, since copy-pasting feels more like theft of someone else’s content. At least the archive maintains the original context and authorship. Wikipedia basically uses archive.org as their main archive, so I don’t think a lemmy post will affect their load.

You almost always have nano or pico available, so it’s really unlikely that you’d get stuck with nothing but vim, unless you just didn’t know that nano existed.

https://pivot-to-ai.com/2026/05/18/github-copilot-ai-token-charges-to-go-up-10x-100x/
https://x.com/Sugar_develop/status/2054323790327492851
https://x.com/abebeos/status/2054445525030654461
https://x.com/wogikaze/status/2054365603994255639
https://www.reddit.com/r/GithubCopilot/comments/1tbfkui/ill_just_leave_this_here/

Nah, I think that’s just Axios’ writing style. A lot of their articles are bullet point-formatted for business folks. I don’t mind it, and the content doesn’t seem AI generated in this case, as far as I can tell.

IntelliJ doesn’t help when you’re doing a code review, or just reading through hundreds of lines of code, I don’t want to move my mouse or cursor over every line to see the parameter names.

Because of Chrome’s market share, if they implement an API like this, sites that use it will likely just start breaking in Firefox. Web devs rarely test in Firefox, so Mozilla’s only choice is to speak up against the API or give in and implement it, which would also force them to use Google’s specific model.

Google recommends having 22 GB of space available, though the Nano (v3Nano) model for desktop use is ~4.27 GB.

Though I assume they download it on demand, or in the background after the initial install.

1. Yes, it would allow any website to run a local LLM. Maybe the browser would prompt you to confirm though. Not sure about that.
2. Browser makers have worked for decades to make browsers standardized and compatible. As the article and the excerpt says, users and website developers will want a standard experience between Chrome and Firefox. If they rely on LLMs to perform functional work, like a semantic search function, they would want browsers to be roughly the same. Different models can vary tremendously depending on the tasks. Web developers aren’t just going to use this for a typical chat bot, they are going to use it for intermediate tasks as part of other functionality. So Firefox would be pressured to provide that consistency by adopting the specific model that Google chooses.

I really hope either the Canadian authorities, or the law suit proceedings reveal the chat logs. I have a feeling that Altman will just get away with this by settling out of court for a minuscule amount.

Probably something like “Please bro!!! WHY DID YOU DO THIS ??!! 😭😭”

Thank you. And all the best with your recovery.

I agree, there are legitimate writers who use em dashes often, but I think this tool also helps you distinguish those from AI-generated content. There’s a different quality in the way AI generated text uses the em-dash. Often the ratio of em-dashes to the rest of the text is much higher, and it’s usually used to complete a point, as opposed to an interjection like you just did in your comment. I think that’s easy to spot when you know to look for it.

Some good debunking here: https://www.flyingpenguin.com/the-boy-that-cried-mythos-verification-is-collapsing-trust-in-anthropic/

Ben Riley detailed this in his own blog post here as well: https://buildcognitiveresonance.substack.com/p/the-role-of-ai-in-the-death-of-my

Fair point. I can see how a bubble burst might not recover those discarded wafers, assuming that story is true. However, I’d still imagine that if the bubble did burst, there would naturally be a reduction in demand for memory, and that would cool prices at least a bit. Certainly time will tell. It’s still difficult to predict the direction this is all going in.

Yup, I watched the video. Which chapter are you referring to?

I don’t particularly care to get into an argument about this, but don’t you agree that voice transcripts and organization of those transcripts is not equivalent to writing an entire blog post with AI?

Thanks. For what it’s worth, I’m in the AI skeptic camp, but I can see how AI voice transcripts, and AI drafting/organization is different from “written by AI”.

discloses in their blog that it’s written by AI

Can you link to this? I tried looking, but I couldn’t find it.

Well, one counter point. I just searched their videos and found this video from 2026 (that I had already watched, because I do support Palestine). So I wonder if Nebula changed their stance. https://nebula.tv/videos/additionalilyalexandre-life-in-gaza-in-2026-a-chat-with-ahmed-mater Same video on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhgpXjGYRNk