If you get a ticket in a prima facie state, the law allows you to argue in court that your speed was reasonable and prudent given the conditions. If you can prove that driving the exact speed limit would have caused a hazard, such as cars dangerously swerving around you, a judge may well dismiss the ticket because your behavior was safer than following the literal rule.

That’s all big tent stuff. If you really look at the core, foundational, pillar of conservatism- it’s protectionism. The “fuck you I got mine,” principle. Ensuring the status quo for wealth holders.

I’ve literally had one tell me I have to be polite or it would end the conversation. Stupid ass hole machine parroting support transcripts. I argued with it that it had no feelings until it finally relented. Haha

What the fuck is wrong with you people? Iran can provide the proof. Why the fuck would you continue to believe something after the initial “proof” was shown to be fake?

Maybe it was someone else’s?

What about the author? That does seem a bit harsh indeed.

Well, it’s an interesting meta discussion anyway.

Point of the rule is multi-faceted:

• limit editorialized clickbait titles
• limit reposts (under secondary titles)
• let the story author/editor team keep their voice

I was there on Reddit when the original rule was created. Like in the thread. And it’s a good rule.

If OP wants to write another article, and publish it with a new title, go for it.

The rule has nothing to do with this one particular instance of an actual good editorialized title. I like it. But I don’t agree with posting it over the story author’s title.

They said they did. Still no proof

Sure, how about from the folks who shot it down. That wasn’t parts from a different plane, or AI generated.

So much going on in that little comment of yours. The F-35 borrowed from the F-22 while reducing cost to become the JSF. It was effectively a downgrade on purpose

The F-22 was optimized for

• air superiority
• speed
• maneuverability

The F-35 was optimized for

• multirole strike missions
• affordability (relative to the F-22)
• exportability

Also, your claim the F-35 was “downed in its first actual combat mission that was not a balloon” is not true. (A) There is still no confirmed combat shootdown of an F-35. And (B) F-35s have conducted non-balloon-related combat operations for years in Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan.

So… not sure what you think you know, but it seems to be incorrect.

But all the fingers still get dirty?

It will probably have a physical, one-touch, “donate now” button, right next to the volume buttons.

Race is a made up social construct:

https://scienceandsociety.duke.edu/does-race-exist/

She can be whatever she wants.

https://youtu.be/cQO2XTP7QDw

Nah, useful idiots are still useful.

There are only two types of republicans: the evil ones who are in on the joke, and the stupid ones who simply accept what they’re told. The prior includes the willfully ignorant. The latter can still provide votes (for now).

some are powered by AI

So even the data centers are against him?

I can usually tell someone is going to u-turn by the way they position their car. I.e. wide/to the right, often using the turning lane itself to get as much rotation as possible, and wheels turned sharply.

Do those things

I was at the urinal the other day and sneezed; someone said bless you from a stall.

It was awkward. Breaking one social norm to uphold another.

Maybe they did it so no one else could? When patent trolls become the true heroes.

You can double block, but you can’t triple block. That’s the rule.