They also worked to make the Iowa Writer’s Workshop a tool of cultural hegemony that focused on individualized experiences and perspectives in literature.

https://www.chronicle.com/article/how-iowa-flattened-literature/

https://www.openculture.com/2018/12/cia-helped-shaped-american-creative-writing-famous-iowa-writers-workshop.html

https://uipress.uiowa.edu/books/workshops-empire

Workshops of Empire explores this history via the careers of Paul Engle at the University of Iowa and Wallace Stegner at Stanford. In the story of these founding fathers of the discipline, Eric Bennett discovers the cultural, political, literary, intellectual, and institutional underpinnings of creative writing programs within the university. He shows how the model of literary technique championed by the first writing programs—a model that values the interior and private life of the individual, whose experiences are not determined by any community, ideology, or political system—was born out of this Cold War context and continues to influence the way creative writing is taught, studied, read, and written into the twenty-first century.

zionism is a pro-state cancer lmao

Probably gave a lot of liberal zionazis “The Strokes” with this one performance.

“GUSHER” refers to something besides oil flowing profusely Mr. Trump.

Looks like this is from last year:

March 27, 2025

They did announce some red lines today, so this could happen again soon.

Did a flying kick at the bucket of death, rest in piss bozo.

And they will know them as EpsteinVidia

https://www.protondb.com/app/1091500

seems like you are the outlier in this case

Thanks for conceding your post.

you have no relevant proof or evidence of your claims, it’s not my problem

you have no relevant proof or evidence of your claims, it’s not my problem

prove it

That’s still just an assertion on your part. Maybe you should surveil some books before making assertions.

Anecdotal evidence can be true or false but is not usually subjected to scholarly methods, scientific methods, or rules of legal, historical, academic, or intellectual rigor, meaning there are little or no safeguards against fabrication or inaccuracy.

This does very little to add any weight to your assertions. No effort is required on my part still.

Surveillance protects people from terrorism, and sacrificing some privacy makes us safer.

In logical discussions, the burden of proof lies with the person making a claim, meaning they must provide evidence for their assertion rather than expecting others to disprove it.