Navidrome might be up your alley.

https://github.com/navidrome/navidrome

I’m a live and let-live type (as well as a former TCH employee), and fully support anyone who wants to detransition for whatever reason.

Yet there is simply zero need for a dedicated program at the end of the day — this is raw fascist political theater. Any run-of-the-mill pediatric endo and mental health provider are typically sufficient. It’s not that medically complex to go in reverse; you’re just trying to kickstart the HPGA back into gear and let endogenous hormones resume.

Devil’s advocate: Maybe this new group could treat a few weird cases where a kid was intersex and did have some corrective surgery they want undone? But nope, Texas Children’s already has a dedicated team of world-class urogenital anomaly specialists who are exactly the people you’d want for that.

It’s this feature-length video the music group Jungle did for one of their albums but never publicized: https://player.vimeo.com/video/846974200?h=d7fad03b63

Feels like it was some weird Kubrick side-project; just insane.

This is just normal in modern academia, tragically. The system is rotten to the core due to “publish or perish” and the players involved all know it.

The fact it got retracted is the surprising part.

Starbucks, Tim Hortons, Dunkin, etc.

Like, why? Life is too short.

See also: Anheuser-Busch products

Cool spot regardless! I’m a native Texan and had my interest piqued by your post yesterday.

Given the location, these guys aren’t that particular cockroach-eating species, but they’re probably a similar parasitoid of some flavor (chrysididae).

E: After digging through some regional entomology references, I’m thinking these are blue mud daubers due to the elongated body and abdomen shape.

You’re sweeping a lot under the rug with that first sentence: Society will adapt. Yeah sure, barring global catastrophe, it will. Doesn’t mean people won’t die and suffer in the process.

I’m making no claims about good vs. bad jobs here; people can self-actualize however they like in my book. Nor was I making any specific point about epidemiology of deaths of despair in the recent past, but I think that trend serves to illustrate the overall point.

Not really.

It’s all about the rate of change: neoliberal globalization has brought down wages across industries, so fewer good jobs are left, and the not-so-good ones barely keep up the same standard of living.

From a neutral historical perspective, some serious pearl-clutching about jobs is not ill-founded.

As you say, people in the past facing these circumstances didn’t all commit suicide. Yet some did it explicitly, some did it indirectly with alcohol or other vices, others just lived less fulfilling lives than they otherwise would have. Nonetheless, we are very much encouraging deaths of despair en masse with our current societal outlook.

Hmm, you’re right — that does seem funky.

Unfortunately I can only speak to the debian side of the house, not the raspbian. But I agree you should be seeing something more recent than that.

That’s what you’re supposed to be on for bookworm. Debian backports security fixes for things like Copy Fail to that kernel version.

Lemmy has many servers, with varying levels of uptime, load, and performance.

Sopuli tends to fare much better than lemmy.world.

Yet you said that without framing it in context of the article the thread was about — so you didn’t contribute anything of value while adding noise.

Your remark was lazy and ill-considered.

A persistent myth that drivers pay for roads through gas taxes and tolls pervades all discussions on transportation funding, limiting the conversation not just about how we pay for transportation but also what our transportation system looks like.

You’re repeating the exact misconception TFA addresses. Your large vehicle fee is a vanishingly small proportion of upkeep.

It’s a well-known rule of matsci

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_power_law

You think there’s a market for something like this?

Not to be too facetious… but it’s called SMB consulting, homie.

What anyone in that industry will tell you is that it’s extremely sink or swim, and the hard part is finding reliable clients willing to pay you appropriately.

If you really wanna go that route, start by registering an LLC and putting together your shared template you wanna build from. Wouldn’t recommend going all-in until you have a few steady clients on your roster, but you can certainly dip your toes in without much headache to see if it’s something you like.

You’d want to tweak the ratios a bit for that — but yeah, I think it’s a great base for an enhanced gin rickey.

I’d probably aim for something like

• 1.5 oz gin
• .5 oz luxardo
• .5 oz green chart
• 1-2 oz lime

with 6-10 oz of club soda, as a very loose starting point.–

You’re missing 1 part lime juice in there.

Good taste though ;).

Where on earth are you getting this from?

Galton was a eugenicist who thought intelligence was baked into one’s bloodline, Spearman’s entire career was that the g-factor was a relatively immutable cross-domain constant, Binet was measuring skulls phrenology style, etc.

Vibe coding, in the sense of telling the model to make codebase changes, then directly using the output produced, is 100% marketing bullshit that does not scale beyond toy examples.

Here’s the rub: Claude is extremely useful as an advanced autocomplete, if and only if you’re guiding it architecturally through every task it runs, and you vet + revise the output yourself between iterations. You cannot effectively pilot entirely from chat in a mature codebase, and you must compile robust documentation and instructions for Claude to know how to work with your codebase.

You also must aggressively manage information in the context window yourself and keep it clean. You mentioned going in circles trying to get the robot to correct itself: huge mistake. Rewind to before the error, and give it better instructions to steer it away from the pitfall it fell into. Same vein, you also need to reset ASAP after pushing into the >100k token mark, because the models start melting into putty soon after (yes, even the “extended” 1M-window ones).

I’m someone who has massively benefited from using modern LLMs in my work, but I’m also a massive hater at the same time: They’re just a tool, not magic, and have to be used with great care and attention to get reasonable results. You absolutely cannot delegate your thinking to them, because it will bite you, hard and fast.

For your use case (3D math), what I recommend is decomposing your end goal into a series of pure functions that you’ll string together. Once you have that list, that’s where Claude comes in. Have it stub those functions for you, then have it implement them one at a time, reviewing the output of every one before proceeding.