No billionaire should ever be audited. They should have their taxes done by a team of IRS agents and then have the taxes owed taken directly from their assets. No fancy accounting loopholes, just a bill of what is owed.

My first car was a Geo Metro that I learned to drive in. One time I got pulled over and the cop claimed I was going 80mph and I told him I didn’t even think it could hit 80mph if you dropped it out of a plane. He decided against writing a ticket.

Arguably it is immoral to NOT cleanse them.

Just take about 10-15% right off the top of the billionaires.

Police get away with murder, the most this cop is in for is high fives from his fellow piggies.

They can say that in the future but as far as this suit goes, didn’t they already say, “Don’t blame us, the prices are going up because of tariffs”?

Data centers are made by companies and companies have board of directors who have heads. CEOs have heads.

Didn’t the French have an option three?

Can the gift shop do souvenirs to order? Like if I wanted one of his tiny fingers from his tiny hands?

Does that mean no one else would have nukes because if they had even one that would mean you were limited to all but that one you didn’t have?

They should be taxed at 100% of wealth that is hidden in offshore accounts. Tax dodgers shouldn’t get to keep half of their ill-gotten gains. If someone steals a candy bar from Walmart they don’t get to keep half the candy bar.

Edit to add: My friends wouldn’t serve me cake that isn’t moist enough to cling to a fork. There are some assumptions that might be specific to my particular friend group. If your friend group delivers you dry cake you might need better friends.

I don’t normally eat cake, but when I do it is a fork. If it were pie I would do a fork for apple, but a spoon for blackberry and cherry. If someone offered me a pie that wasn’t blackberry or cherry I would re-evaluate my friendship with them.

I live in a rural area and I regularly talk to people on my walk. For me they are strangers but apparently I talk to a lot the them regularly. I don’t remember faces/names easily so often they address me like a friend and I am clueless.

That is not how it is done. It is the police chief saying, “We investigated ourselves and (found no wrongdoing)/(everything was within policy).” Occasionally it will be a prosecutor saying something along the lines of, “There isn’t enough evidence to get a guilty verdict so we are not going to pursue this.” If it gets past both of these the judge will dismiss the case for some random excuse or they do a bench trial where instead of a jury the judge just decides the cop is innocent. Very rarely it will make it to a jury trial and the cop will lie his ass off and never get charged for perjury.

Hypothetically, yes there are justified shootings. Deciding if a shooting is justified should be done by a jury though, not an internal investigation. All lethal use of force cases should be prosecuted and guilt/innocence should be decided by a jury. The use of lethal force justification being decided by a judge/prosecutor/police is short-cutting the legal standard that any other victim would see their perpetrator held to and is therefore a 14th amendment violation.

All the police have is unsubstantiated claims from a 911 call. Thinking that is enough for lethal force is why SWATing happens. Fake 911 calls about serious crimes trying to get the police to show up and murder people. The job of the police is not to determine guilt or innocence, nor do they punish, those are for the judicial branch.

Depraved indifference homicide.

Imagine you are so hated you are the runner up to Trump and then not having self realization and needing to get it reiterated to you at the expense of the well being of the entire country.

Not to be “that guy” but for me it really depends on who is choking. Some people I could see choking and my response would be to calmly finish my meal and in my head hope that they expire before I lose my appetite due to their horrible death rattle.