Professional shit-stirrer stirs shit. Nothing to see here, move on.

Hate to break it to you, but they got killed by a mugger.

Is that his German döppelgänger?

Yeah sure, we’re the reason you can’t get cock off your mind.

Am i right in thinking that your intro and ‘bottom line’ are handwritten, but the middle section (emoji-laden and sprinkled with overconfident sourceless statistics) is AI generated?

Lab grown meat doesn’t have to compete with real meat, it has to compete with the meat alternatives.

Depends on the goals. If you want people to stop eating real meat and switch to lab-grown, then it does need to be on or around the same level as real meat.

Without wearing a raincoat.

I think it’d be awesome if the taste would be good, and it can be done safe and energy efficient. Three big ifs though.

Would they buy the actual drones, or the technical sheets on how to builld them? They don’t exactly fit under raincoat.

Good one…

Goodbye

Stop trying to sell me China

I’m not comparing it to anything, I’m judging it at face value, and it doesn’t pass the smell test. It leads to countries with a one-party system getting scored +5 on pluralism. That ‘does not track’.

You can look into their methodology

I did, my opinion is that obviously that’s not a very smart way of conducting the questionnaire.

Thanks for the link, my point was that posting random pictures without context/methodology/sources is not very helpful.

So the questionnaire asks people how positive/negative they perceive the categories in their own country, I’m not really sure that methodology works very well for oppressive countries.

cool… cool…

Did you read my dictionary link?

That’s your context, I brought mine. That’s what happens when context is missing (and that was OP’s point).