These days though you can just breakpoint()

I just looked in Voyager and that’s one of the options, so I’m guessing people press that before seeing that they can enter a custom answer.

And, critically distinct from the AGPL, they wouldn’t have to open source their full service — just the changes to the library.

The thing is this isn’t a single spectrum. The requirement the AGPL adds to the GPL could be applied to the LGPL without including the requirements added by the GPL.

To take the video game analogy, it’s more like asking why you can’t set the brightness above 50% if the graphics quality is set to ultra.

The answer here is that the FSF likely doesn’t see the utility in such a license.

Cars say those are amateur numbers

Yes, and then they have a whole thing about how under 5 kcal per serving can be rounded to zero because it’s negligible.

That’s why despite nobody on the planet having ever eaten a single tic tac at a time, the serving size is 1 tic tac. That’s only 4 kcal, so in the US they can call it a “calorie-free snack”

Mama bought the pack of samples your dentist buys to give you.

Better argument for Celsius:

They have been trying to work with the Flatpak people to make it a standard everyone could share. After half a decade of frustration I think they just gave up and decided to do it themselves.

I’m not the person you replied to, but I would love to have more ARM hardware for running tests on. A lot of what I write needs to be separately tested on each architecture.

The other LTS kernels didn’t get it until yesterday, and this thread has some good info about why: https://infosec.exchange/@wdormann/116489443704631952

Yes, both.

The architecture is really varied. You can get super cheap SoCs that are barely capable of running FreeRTOS, and you can get 100+ core beasts with EFI, PCIe, etc.

If I digest it and poop out normal poop, PFAS

I’m pretty sure Microsoft has more people working on Linux stuff than Canonical has total employees.

I thought X was the everything app?

Some Canonical employees are working on it but it’s not originally a Canonical project.

If both employers have the same policy, one spouse selects primary and the other selects secondary.

My work gives parental leave based on whether they’re the primary caretaker or the secondary one. The primary gets 6 months, the secondary gets 3.

What decider whether you’re primary or secondary? Simple. If your partner is taking more than 3 months they’re primary.

What this means in practice is that for US-based employees pretty much everyone at my company is the primary caretaker since few people’s spouses even have the option for more than 3 months.

Hopefully their plan for software sovereignty includes using a European desktop environment.