Trying to make a worldview which I call the oakframe. I am very interested in democratic confederalism as envisioned by Abdullah Öcalan.
It was a comment of what society should be rather than what it is. Ofcourse there are toxic jobs in todays capitalist system. Work that cause over production, that helps oil companies, washes brands, makes us more dependent on cars or cause mass dehumanization.
In an ideal society we dont have ICE officers. We dont have toxic work. We just have work depending on whats meeded.
Serfs needs to subordinate to the masters.
No work is less valuable than others.
all work is equal
They could make a rule saying:
First hand posting of slop is not allowed. Second hand posting is allowed as long as it is sufficiently relevant.
Either we normalize smart glasses or we dont. There’s nothing in between. We should not play into Metas surveillance strategy.
Lets not normalize [smart] glasses.
If we want to forward our dreams, we have to be assertive. Otherwise dreams will only be imposed upon us from might.
I dont expect perfection. We live under a machine where we are forced to use cars whether we like it or not. We cant expect the individual to move away from the car because the machine forces it upon us. Its a planned economy ruled in the name of profit, and they construct society to require cars. We should however expect people to dream.
I can agree that posting about being downvoted gives of negative vibes. But I dont think that is enough to call it toxicity. If I am approaching the conversation in a destructive manner, then I can agree with you.
I don’t think it’s far fetched, but we can disagree on that. Can you tell me how I’m being toxic?
Your idea is a pie in the sky that will never be achieved.
I’m sorry, I didn’t see the sign about “dreaming not allowed”.
Ofcourse it is possible to live without cars. Most of human history people has been fine without cars. It’s just the past hundrer years it has been normalized by the machine through advertisements and capitalism.
Car infrastructures require over-production, so if we want cars, then we have to accept that we can’t live with nature. Seems like you chose the game over screen.
The supposed reason we need cars is to drive to work, go to grocery stores, visit friends from far away. But there is nothing saying that life has to be this way, we don’t need to reach the world. It should be sufficient to live slowly and in our local communities.
no mate
the truth has to be told, whether you are ready or not🙏
We need to move away from over production. Towards safety in our communities. Towards thriving towns. Towards living with nature🐝
By releasing our need for cars, we move towards the lokening of our communities and Gaja🌍
#ZeroCarz
It IS propaganda! Electric cars still cause overproduction. All Cars Are Bad!
Zero Carz for a living Gaja 🦔🌍
raid against humanity
That’s a raid!
Stand your ground.
Google reducing traffic for websites worldwide.
But for real, I think GrapheneOS could take this stand if they’ve got the balls.
But I think the real reason nobody is doing this is the paradigm of reasonability.
Nobody want to step their foot down, because that’s not reasonable. We are supposed to make it work like the wife exposed to domestic violence.
But we need to stop being reasonable and start being assertive.
Im just waiting for somebody to make a plan for resistance. So far the best I have seen is going to the doorsteps of google to cry and beg them to stop.
thats not my cup of tea
Good first impression.