“All” is a lot of people.

But we are in one of the coldest weeks of the year here. Everybody has used heavy coats all through the day, and complained about it.

When I wrote my previous comment, my thermometer was marking 23.5°C. It was around noon, and it’s crazy cold for noon. But it’s still marking 23°C now at night (because my home is closed), what is not very cold (outside it probably is).

Anything bellow 25 should require space heaters and the option to wear a blanket.

Anyway, hello from Brazil. Yes, YMMV.

The sequels aren’t.

Non-coding architects has been a well known organizational red-flag for decades.

Non-coding people always lose track of reality, and it’s a disaster to give them decision power over fine-grained technical choices.

Now, I don’t really know how that maps into non-coding software developers, but I’m not optimist.

I’m reserving my judgment until after 2038. But yes, everything looks much better this century.

Does Windows run at all in that amount of memory?

It’s agile if the plan is constantly reviewed with every new information in mind and you can change what you are working in to better implement it.

If you do do Scrum, that’s almost never the case.

Somebody that defends personal freedom.

deleted by creator

“Lost at sea” means he gone out for fishing and never returned.

He may be out buying cigarettes for all we know.

They have a golden statue somewhere…

If you can hold the mandatory economist’s compulsion to be liberal for long enough to write a coherent argument for that intervention, I’m willing to count it and update my opinion.

They never were.

People repeating them on the internet used to do it ironically. But conspiracies always were actual belief systems and have always brought groups of people together to reinforce each other idiocies.

I’ve never seen an economist argue is favor of non-safety related building codes. Ever.

What he is saying is completely correct on the context that he is talking about the people insisting on pacific resistance to Fascism before WWII.

The person quoting him without context in a way that completely changes the meaning of his words is wrong, and one has to wonder if honest at all.

People only achieve life-goals because they get attached to the process of making them happening. No single person ever has set a multi-year goal and achieved it because they were chasing the goal.

What am I missing?

Every traffic situation where people would need to cross but there won’t be a car stopper exactly over the sensor.

Not exhaustively:

• pedestrians

• motorcycles

• bicycles

• cars stopped at the wrong place

Those sensors are the apex of Modernist arrogance, where people just decide they know every detail about any system they look at and can control everything.

There is no single place where they work. But at least people have been steadily removing them for the last 30 years.

How is your experience on reality following up with that kind of thing?

But then those miles in the GP would be nautical. So 4 1/2.