

I thought it was awful. The graphics and the 2d textures looked weird and the movement was absurd. It was unplayable. UT, on the other hand, was fantastic.


I thought it was awful. The graphics and the 2d textures looked weird and the movement was absurd. It was unplayable. UT, on the other hand, was fantastic.


I’m guessing you mean the 20th century in general rather than 1900-1910? Because not many of us are going to be that old.
It was… wonderful and fucking awful in equal amounts. The details have changed between then and now, but the ratio is probably about the same.


Do mods realise how little it narrows things down when they do the mod thing and don’t even say what comment or post was problematic?
Maybe people older than me had typing classes and people younger had IT classes then - my age group didn’t have anything like that.
I’m in my 50s. I don’t know anyone who has ever been taught to type.


fseek(stream, 0, SEEK_END);
Working from home and everyone being understanding about work-life balance, mental health etc., without it being a big deal. No pressure (at least not like I used to get when I was younger!)


This is my comment to you.
I’m on a vpn posting this comment.


What would there be to mock? They could talk about bugs or features, but those are things that get updated with time on JF as well as Plex. Every other change is to do with enshitification which is a proprietary issue.


What does this have to do with new TV shows and films?


Quick correction point:
any other email provider via IMAP
Not all email providers use IMAP


Power usage? Both systems should be doing basically nothing unless they’re re-indexing - which is generally done on-demand. I can understand using up a bit of memory for the basic service and an imperceptible amount of CPU time, but why would it be using more power?


I quite like that people ask simple questions like this. Sure, it could have been looked up really quickly, but it adds to the overall thread here. People reading this with no prior knowledge can browse through the comments and absorb more information.


But then why pick 23, a number with two significant digits, to indicate scale? By this logic, 10 would be as effective at communication.


I saw this and thought it meant someone had improved on the perfect caption (right).


An “atom bomb” is not a standard unit of measurement. It’s less than helpful.
To be fair, in Poltergeist they were essentially all part of a broth.
Could she be butter?
What happens in 18 years when the bots are all grown up?