A healthy, broadly educated population, which feels safe and secure, is incompatible with, and toxic to, conservative and authoritarian ideologies.

They need you to be sick, stupid, and scared.

My original post never even referred to you, unless you’re also morbidly wealthy.

Manufacturing imaginary attacks similarly manifests harms to legitimate discourse.

As a medically morbidly obese guy, I have absolutely zero issues with invoking obesity as an apt technical description of the unhealthy and damaging consequences resultant of the tolerance of their existence.

Those who qualify to be diagnosed as medically obese typically don’t have a readily available remedy for their condition, but the financially obese can legitimately be held solely responsible for their rehabilitation.

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

Money is real.

Anyone who is impressed with LLMs to the point they believe they should in any way be mistaken for intelligence must be summarily ignored and excluded from decision processes which affect anyone not similarly impaired.

LLMs are only AI as Accelerators and Amplifiers of Ignorance and Incompetence, with vanishingly scarce examples of Iteration and Insight.

Affordability is a function of an economic environment, which makes it an intrinsically imaginary problem.

All governments have a unique ability, through policy, to require the provision of a base load of subsistence resources before extraction is tolerated, not doing so is literally a choice.

Tolerating the concept of affordable housing creates an unnecessary, and debasing, stratification.

To rephrase my original assertion, the first 100% of primary residence demand should just be understood to be housing. Secondary, short stay, premium, and other use cases should only be tolerated in the stock beyond that initial 100%.

The first 100% of primary residence demand should never be anything other than affordable. Any other category of housing should only be tolerated in the stock beyond that threshold.

The normalisation of affordable housing as a legitimate concept is one of the most carcinogenic social infections.

LLMs are only AI as Accelerators and Amplifiers of Ignorance and Incompetence, with vanishingly scarce examples of Iteration and Insight.

The Peter Principle helps illuminate why many in management consider LLM infected tools as preferable subordinates.

The tokens burned to extrude this clearly qualify for a monstrous bulk discount.

Why would one’s exposure to raw sewage be decided democratically? I’d prefer experts with proven qualifications to be in control of such decisions, not a clown convulsing in the tank naked covered raw whip marks.

I’m genuinely curious which part of your reply we should interpret as intelligence?

If anything, these are Iterations, which I’ll add to the list.

Any instance of LLMs being adduced as intelligence must be mercilessly ridiculed and mocked. No one impressed by slop should ever be permitted contribution to decisions affecting anyone not similarly cognitively impaired.

LLMs are only AI as Accelerators and Amplifiers of Ignorance and Incompetence, with vanishingly scarce examples of Insight.

The number of competent experts who are impressed by an LLM wielded in their qualified field is as vanishingly infinitesimal as legitimate and justifiable invocations of the term ‘AI’.

Those who have expressed the greatest enthusiasm for ‘AI’ are typically the farthest removed from actual, nuanced comprehension.

It’s a grift economy built on statistically luke-warm, vibe lobotomised corpses.

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

The most expensive seats need to be in the thruster nozzles.

I don’t trust anyone who is still impressed by LLMs enough to consider them to be in any way adjacent to intelligence.

That would be the preferred method of firing him.

Mythology is the rules invoked to justify a religion.

I use this framing to explain how finance is the rules invoked to justify an economic model.

They’re both control mechanisms conjured by the ruling class to maintain class division, the newer incarnation just substituted smiting with accounting.

The US has been a nation no-one should treat as a serious entity since 2024-11-05, and can not be again until they can prove their ability to hold another legitimate election, and concluded the Nuremberg-a-Lago trials.