that’s somewhat the thesis of varoufakis in ‘technofeudalism’.

not endorsing the book. i am still very unsure abt it. but … maybe you wanna know?

with 2gb ram, linux might work, actually. i’d go for ‘lightweight distros’. but firefox has become hungry …

thanks. please call out my half-assed knowledge more! :)

hm thanks for pointing that out. i will have to thonk abt that for longer though.

like any good model it has it’s scope. inductivity and capacity are out of scope. electrical current is not electrons pushing each other as a longitudinal wave in water could make it wiggle in a pipe. as soon as something stops to make sense in the model we need a new model.

[edit: redacted bc idk enough abt what i said here]

the water allegory unfortunately breaks down very quickly. pressure is force per area. voltage is a difference in potential (~charge).

i feel like someone might be better to really answer to your questions. my physics ed is … long gone.

edit: ofc electrical currents (flow/wiggeling) heat up materials through interaction with it. so yeah electrons transmit the energy they get to tge materials.

transistors (and diodes) are black magic to me. i learned to calculate, but never understood the how and why. you might wanna have a look into the avalanche effect, that is at play in a transistor switching. its a good rabbithole for a weekend, i promise!

i feel that. i assumed it is an autistic trait … also theres a trans thing in my life. i like my new name a lot better.

still there are situations, in which i think it’s unneccesarry to say my name. especially , when you already have my attention. people pointed to ‘removing distance’ as a function. i usually like my distance. “hi, kluczyczka.” sounds waaay to forward, as if you want to eat me. if you already have my attention, just say “hi”. …

in languages which have strong formality, i tend to use these forms a lot more than others too, this usually uses the family name , which has a nice distance to it? so “hi, ms tchncs.de” would be fine with me.

well redundancies are first of all expensive. plus there are already alternate ways of distribution. these are just insufficient for a naval blockade. the capacity of pumping it up and then putting it on a ship quasi-on-site is always gonna be magnitudes bigger and cheaper, than building pipelines. so …

a lot of oil comes from the persian gulf. that is hard to get out otherwise. saudi arabia has a pipeline to their westcoast, but that wouldn’t meet the demand.

the strait of hormuz is a major choke point in oil trade. unfortunately oil is stil a key ressource for everything. …

the only things that are visible all year around, are circumpolar objects. these are objects that are close to the north or south pole respectively. if you sit on the northern hemisphere, you will not see the southern ones ever. even wirh these you will notice a different orientation if you compare them hour by hour for summer and winter.

lot has been said. deutsche christen werent catholics. but they sound familiar, these days.

i’ like to add chechnya, georgia, syria, transnistria, and karabakh. for vladi. wagner also engages in africa

as a non-native i use tho to rebel against english orthography a bit, and because its faster – just like i side with the belgians and say septant instead of soixante-dix; or as i side with the saxons finding drei-viertel-zehn more convincing.

non standard lingo ftw! :)

most probably your it blocks all devices from the network unless whitelisted. that’s a rational thing to do imho.

OnO

i found a german (federal republik of germany) text once that quoted a german text published in switzerland marking a word that was written with double-s instead of s-z-ligature (ß) with “[sic!]” as if the orthography of their neighbours was a mistake.

(´°̥̥̥̥̥̥̥̥ω°̥̥̥̥̥̥̥̥｀)

most niche: studied ugaritic for 3 semesters. (not really a conversational skill but with the arabic and hebrew i know it made for a surprisingly nice “reading phoenician inscriptions at the museum”-day. see it is useful, father!)

cease your investigations.

i will not further discuss my bookshelf or any other interior item of mine without an attorney.

they do not provide proof. why should you? he could as well argue my bookshelf didn’t exist, since none of you have seen it yourself. but is this a discussion worth having?

also: the underlying idea, that modern tech could do better whatever a human has done without it, is just naïve. we do not build much rounded shapes in windows and stuff anymore bc our machines work best and most efficient for straight cuts if we want to make use of their power we have to build a certain way.

at this point, i might go for claves. no harmonics needed.