• 2 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 3rd, 2023

help-circle




  • Sure, but that takes a lot of time and effort when you have a complicated stack, so it’s nice to be able to handle it in two clicks instead of setting up an entire encode queue while cross referencing all my metadata so I get episodes mapped right. Often a series session will take me upward of 30 minutes to set up an encode queue manually. With Discarr, it takes me 30 seconds

    Edit: this came out of many attempts to create a single script that could post-process torrents, unpacking archives or converting disk images dynamically. The trouble is that dvd formatting for series follows no standards whatsoever, and really requires a human to map the titles. Discarr automates everything except that, and surfaces the title and episode queues side-by-side to allow quick identification and assignment













  • The pricing question assumes the current model (cloud inference, centralized compute, hyperscaler margins) is the only model.

    Local inference flips that math entirely. If the model runs on your hardware, the marginal cost to the provider is close to zero. The pricing problem is a distribution problem, not a compute problem.

    What I think actually happens: cloud AI settles at $20-50/month for power users who need the latest frontier models and don’t want to manage hardware. That’s sustainable. The “free tier” disappears or gets severely throttled.

    But for a large chunk of use cases (summarization, classification, drafting, local assistants) models small enough to run on a consumer GPU are already good enough. That market doesn’t need to pay $50/month to Anthropic. It needs a good local runner and a one-time hardware investment.

    The companies that will survive the pricing correction are the ones who either have genuinely differentiated frontier capability, or who make local deployment easy enough that users own their own stack.