• 0 Posts
  • 84 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 22nd, 2023

help-circle








  • ragepaw@lemmy.catomemes@lemmy.worldMovies
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 days ago

    Alien is an interesting case study.

    Dan O’Bannon wrote the screenplay for the movie Dark Star. It was not a great movie. He took his core concept, wrote a new version with less comedy and more horror and that became Alien.


  • ragepaw@lemmy.catomemes@lemmy.worldMovies
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    You’re right.

    I think a lot of people here are missing the point. It should not be, “I like this thing so remake it”, it should be “this thing had a great idea but the execution was awful so remake it”.


  • ragepaw@lemmy.catomemes@lemmy.worldMovies
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Krill, absolutely. The original was fun but not good.

    Enemy Mine was a great movie and should be left untouched.

    The Last Starfighter is an interesting one. I don’t think it would benefit from a remake, but because the entire movie is split between the live action scenes and the cheese 80s CG scenes, you could easily replace the space battles with a new version and leave the rest alone.








  • What a nonsensical point.

    Since you like links;

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum

    “form of argument that attempts to establish a claim by showing that following the logic of a contrary proposition or argument would lead to absurdity”

    I need to add

    You are setting up a false equivalence. There is a vast difference between a baseless, unprovable fantasy (like alien clones) and evaluating a public figure’s actions based on a well-documented history of psychological projection.

    When someone constantly accuses their opponents of staging events and has a documented history of projection, it creates a lack of trust. The reason people question the narrative is because of that history, not because they are entertaining fantasies about the Matrix or alien clones. Equating a discussion about someone’s known behavioral patterns to science fiction doesn’t address the core issue of trust.


  • More than one thing can be true.

    Trump could have staged it.

    He could be taking advantage of the situation to push an agenda.

    Both can be true at the same time.

    The reason so many people are quick to believe is because Trump has a history of projection where he accuses other people of doing things that he himself would or has done. And Trump and his followers have accused so many others of false flag or staged events.

    CONSTANTLY

    So when you have a history of a guy who’s face shows up under “psychological projection” in the dictionary, constantly accusing others of things, you can credibly believe that he would do those things himself.

    I’m not saying this was a staged event, and I have no idea of the reality. But I 100% believe this is a thing he would do.