Interesting phrasing. A phrasing that assumes assumptions on my part. So … what social credit system DOES exist.
Interesting phrasing. A phrasing that assumes assumptions on my part. So … what social credit system DOES exist.
It is possible to oppose all three things. It is possible to simultaneously oppose the Social Credit System in China, the Credit Score system in the United States, and the elites connected to Jeffrey Epstein.


I was talking about Pam Bondi, not Melania
He is describing Donald Trump, actually.
Edit: except he does have real estate. But he still shouldn’t be in charge.
I have been happy as a Linux user for more than ten years now. Never looked back. I use Trisquel.


I look forward to LibrePhone coming online. I hope it comes soon …
“Librephone — Free Software Foundation — Working together for free software” https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/librephone


I have F-Droid on my Android phone. Iike having a marketplace where I can download floss apps.


Bondi chose the situation she currently is in. Epstein’s victims did not.


Calling a local towing service is also an option.


On what continent is the nation of Ukraine? How can you say Russia is not a threat to Europe when it is literally attacking Europe right now?
I am curious, who is “them” in your statement and how does opposing all three of those things inherently cause me to give up my bargaining power?