As far as I can tell, claw code is the python reproduction of Claude code that the leaker/discoverer wrote up to avoid getting sued or at least taken off github for hosting their leaked code. I haven’t looked at the repo much so it might be very incomplete, but maybe it works!
Fun, but annoying when articles like this reference online resources like github repos and hackernews threads without linking to them anywhere
https://github.com/instructkr/claw-code Maybe the hackernews thread? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47584540
I think interesting? It’s kind of hard to tell.
You are going to have to significantly tone down the editorialization and platitudes to get this to a place where a journal might consider it.
Make the point of how it’s novel or useful by explaining what it does, not by repeating that it’s novel and useful.
Problem is that to be able to decide whether or not to say no to the code you need to be able to reason about it, and to reason about it you need to wrap your head around at least parts of the output of the prolific, not-afraid-of-complexity AI output.
And that takes time! maybe enough time to defeat the alleged benefit of having it written for you in some cases