• 0 Posts
  • 33 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 27th, 2026

help-circle
  • This is creepy as hell. I liked the Renault 5 - until now. Fuck this shit. I wont pay a small fortune, just to enslave myself to a 1984-style digital panopticon. I am getting angry just by reading your story. Corporate greed is once again crossing the line, slowly shifting the overtone window. Everyone who is not concerned about this, is simply ignorant and/or borderline stupid.

    If it was my car, I’d probably cover it. And if it then starts beeping, I’d maybe even locate the speaker and deactivate that one, too.

    I wonder if it is even legal to sell you something like this without informing you prior to your purchase.


  • Im with you. And i think social media didnt stop being social by accident. Once a platform becomes expected to grow forever:

    • People stop being the product’s purpose and become a resource to extract value from
    • Communities become audiences
    • Conversations become content
    • Hobbies become enshittified engagement metrics

    Id argue that the internet didnt suddenly forget how to be social, but that it was purposfully optimized not to be.




  • First of all: great thing that you found something that you can be passionate about. Thats worth a lot.

    On topic: I am not a native english speaker, so when reading english literature, I prefer sentences that are grammatically and syntactically somewhat well-structured. It becomes much easier for me to read when authors do not rely too heavily on context, but instead ensure that each sentence contains a clear subject, verb, and the necessary objects. Thats the main thing bothering me in your texts The downside is that this can make the writing sound somewhat formal or scientific, which might not be to your liking. So maybe don’t listen to me at all :D

    Also, I know many people on here dont like AI, but text handling is exactly what it was made for. With the right prompts, you could analyse your work and look for low-quality-sentences and manually overthink them. Just as an idea.




  • The demand for greater security always poses a threat to personal freedom. It is therefore only natural that those who wish to curtail this freedom in order to gain control over society do so by stoking fear and uncertainty regarding terrorism, migration, Islam, and so on.

    Off topic: After 9/11, investigators recovered 19 personal IDs from the ruins, all belonging to Arab individuals. All these IDs “somehow” survived the impact, the fires intense enough to weaken the steel beams, the collapse itself, and the chaos that followed at ground zero. The tragedy was then used to generate the level of public fear necessary to justify greatly expanding state control. It’s a fight against their own people.



  • Mhm, I think this is more complicated than it looks. The LF today isn’t a direct Linux kernel funding body and more an umbrella for open-source governance (infrastructure, events, certification, security work, to name a few). So the other 97% are not necessarily wasted. Also, many kernel developers are paid outside of the LF by companies like Red Hat, Google, AMD, SUSE, Microsoft. So in reality there is alot more cash flowing towards Linux kernel development. A better/sharper criticism would be that the LF has become an industry consortium for “enterprise open source” or so, rather than a Linux-centered foundation. The counterpoint on the other Hand is that this founded infrastructure is exactly what allows large-scale open-source projects to function in the first place.





  • I am new to the topic, so I can’t really contribute. But I love to see other people help the boycott.

    • Switched to Vivaldi. Awesome browser on all plattforms IMO.

    • Switched to Proton Mail, and feel good about it. Why is Proton bad?

    • And Big Win: I now host my own Nextcloud, Kalender and paperless-ngx. Highly recommend these, from a usability point of view. Can’t say much about the technical or security perspective.




  • First of all, I’d say we’re on the same side. Israel is acting like a disgusting piece of shit. Also, many Israelis are abusing the term “antisemitic” to discredit people that they dont like. But I think we still need to differentiate. Therefore let me answer your question:

    If the vanalism is against Israeli officials/buildings/state institutions, thats fine! Like ambassies, consulates, (international) representatives, politicians, economic figures, IDF members, etc… They are waging war and genocide, they deserve our anger + protest.

    But If it hits religious institutions, private folks, jewish communities, holocaust memorials, etc. with no Israeli state background or links to the IDF, then maybe dont attack them, because otherwise it really is nothing but antisemitism. And that’s the point. If it was really only about the state of Israel, then why do so many “protests” explicitly target Jewish religious institutions (like synagogues, cemeteries, schools) rather than Israeli ones? It is not even rare thing to happen, thats why I wonder why you are asking. Examples:

    Moldova, Kasauti. A Holocaust memorial was vandalized with ‘free Palestine’ graffiti.

    Ukraine, Uman. A swastika was painted on a Jewish café.

    UK, Glasgow. “Free Palestine” and “Fuck the no really Jews” were painted on a wall.

    Italy, Milan. A man shouted “murderers” in front of a Jewish nursing home.

    Italy, Milan. An elderly Jewish man, wearing a hat with a Star of David, was walking his dog, when a man tore off his hat, trampled it, and called the elderly man “dirty Jew.”

    Italy, Milan. An Orthodox Jewish man was insulted on his way to a synagogue by an Italian couple who said to him, “F—king Zionist! You kill children!” On his way home he was shoved by a young man who shouted antisemitic epithets at him.

    Germany, Oldenburg. An incendiary device was thrown at the door of the Oldenburg synagogue.

    Belgium, Fleron. The home of Belgian Holocaust survivors was vandalized with “Gaza Free” and a swastika.

    Munich, Germany. A man stood in front of the main synagogue, shouted antisemitic insults and give Hitler salutes.

    Montevideo, Uruguay. A doll depicting a Jewish women with a Star of David and a spear piercing her forehead was displayed during a march for International Women’s Day.

    Paris, France. A man wearing a kippah was attacked as he left a synagogue.

    Babenhausen, Germany. A Jewish memorial column was smeared with paint.

    Geneva, Switzerland. “Exterminate the Jews” and “Death to Zionists” graffiti were found in Geneva after a pro-Palestinian rally.

    https://newengland.adl.org/resources/article/global-antisemitic-incidents-wake-hamas-war-israel

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/religion/2026/02/13/maryland-synagogue-antisemitism-vandalism/

    https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/san-leandro-high-school-lawsuit-22220489.php

    https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/my-synagogue-is-seen-as-too-dangerous-for-kids-72ndg5cdb



  • Additional note: Your framing is somewhat binary, relying on a “if you’re not with me, you’re against me” logic. I understand the emotions that come with this topic, but your logic reduces complex positions to two options despite the existence of intermediate views. Nuanced actors might then be pushed into opposing camps, therefore intensifying conflict.

    Edit, for context: Damned be Israel for everything they are doing right now. I am just trying to maintain some discourse quality.


  • Restricting certain forms of speech can be interpreted in two ways: As suppression of legitimate political critique. Or as boundary-setting to prevent generalizations or escalation.

    Whether specific political positions are restricted depends not on how you see them, but on how moderators classify them. “Anti-Zionism” is not a single, defined category. It ranges from policy criticism against Israel, to positions that some moderators may interpret as targeting jews.