This reads like AI slop, and when you get to the end, it turns out even the graph was made by an AI, and the whole thing is just an ad for an AI company to try to corner another market, this time the “good looking but bad infographic” that is all the rage on Dataisbeatiful and the like. Great.
5th paragraph, after an ad break:
Total Blocking Time [quantifies] how unavailable the main thread is during page load.
Big fan of Big Vegan Flavor, we signed up for her ‘year of meal plans’ thing and now if we don’t know what we want for the week yet before going shopping we just pick one that sounds good and the shopping list is already made. Not technically a cookbook though, I guess.
I had the f12 developer console thing open recently when I went to do a Google search and was blown away that a basic Google search has over 12 megabytes of network traffic flying around. My ad blockers and such blocked most of it, so it’s clearly not required.
The way eink display prices scale is insane. You can get a 13 inch one for like 200, but any bigger than that it skyrockets. Must be that they still struggle to get good display yields across that large of an area, defect rates or something.
The money comes from all the other users that bet the other outcome when the odds were a specific thing. Polymarket pretty much can’t lose money on a bet having a specific outcome. If people werent betting the other side, the odds would be different
You —(data)—> discord —(data)—> persona ----(your data) ----> openai and groq and anthropic and everyone else.
Hope that helps. If you want the other side of it about how you get money from selling your data to openai it looks like this: you don’t.
You ----(no money)---- discord ----(money)—> persona <----(money) ---- openai, anthropic, etc.
Aaaaand it’s down. Guess someone at Microsoft is monitoring hackernews
Ahhh, so “Honor killings” are now acceptable in the US.
Looking ino it. All it did was take the data from this graph https://www.newyorkfed.org/research/college-labor-market#--:explore:unemployment remove half the info so the “author” could present it as a late “ah-ha” in the article when it came time to compare having a degree vs not having one