Invest in firearms

*capital

I just remember so much bunting. Didn’t know bunting was a thing until '76. Suddenly, red white and blue fabric draped over everything.

Only 7% on any given day, right?

Yeah, I’ve never understood why people don’t get this. The scene has him flying around the planet so that we can see within a single frame what he is doing and what effect it is producing. Granted, it is completely made up physics he is using, but it isn’t as stupid or unreasonable as people portray it as.

“missed”

I switched years ago at work for similar reasons. When I carried it over at home, my left-handed partner at the time didn’t like it - thought it was confusing to use a left-handed mouse. Go figure

That’s a brutal looking reaction! If I touched something like that, I’d look back on that moment and really not like it.

875.87 times smaller

What is this even supposed to mean? Whenever I hear comparisons of numbers like this, I just cringe. Wouldn’t 1 times smaller be zero? (n - (1 x n) = 0). What is 875.87 times smaller? Undoubtedly, they mean to express that the population is one 875.87th the size, so why not say that? Something isn’t, as another example, 3 times cheaper; it’s one third the price.

I think I’m losing my edge

I’m a boy shocked there aren’t casualties being claimed. I don’t think I believe they got stuck in mud, just like a lot of the ogre engine trouble claims.

Exclude me, but what our you saying hear?

Take keys, hand back pocket chachkies

So, a war of choice. Got it

I’m tired of socializing losses. Let’s socialize some gains this time.

Most senators’ sons are in their fifties

I bought my current car new - over 20 years ago.

Who hasn’t been banned from at least one Waffle House?

That is not a funny thing to do to our aquatic friends

Yes and no, I think. It isn’t really huge amounts of data, and the patterns aren’t super complex, so a neural network would pick up a lot. But, given how far the signals travel, the intermittent nature of the signals, and how little they can initially be associated with a particular vehicle, I think in most environments associating a particular set of signals with a particular car would require some human field work. Sure, there are circumstances where automated pairing would be trivial (like at a toll booth), but catching signals in the wild and processing by neural net alone might be ok for analyzing traffic patterns while not being enough for surveillance.

Yeah, I don’t know what the range is for picking these signals up, but I know that the detections just scroll on and on on my laptop’s screen when there is any traffic near my house.

I never realized how chatty the world is on the radio spectrum until playing with one of these. From my house, I can see reports from half a dozen water meters (several reporting leaks), readings from wireless weather stations, signals from certain types of remotes, location data from aircraft, and of course bluetooth and wifi signals from phones and homes. The real trick in using this for tracking would be in filtering out all of the information you aren’t interested in.