Any game that has a Linux version on GoG, I get it there.
Yes, it is 5 times the price and I pay it.

So I got the mail from GoG too and decided to finally see what “slavic” means.

The Slavs or Slavic people are groups of people who speak Slavic languages. Slavs are geographically distributed throughout the northern parts of Eurasia; they predominantly inhabit Central Europe, Eastern Europe, Southeastern Europe, and Northern Asia, though there is a large Slavic minority scattered across the Baltic states and Central Asia, and a substantial Slavic diaspora in the Americas, Western Europe, and Northern Europ…

IDK maybe I have been desensitised to more subtle topics after enduring more threatening problems all these years, but this seems just another term similar to “Gothic”, “Nordic” and the likes. What’s the problem over here?

And while “The End of the Sun” made me at least read through the page thanks to the ‘Tux’ symbol under its name, I won’t have the time for another Skyrim, so skipping this.

Mr. NitrileNextTime.

Well, Babe❤️❤️ specifically said they guessed 3 of the 💍’s, so…

Well, perhaps if they just let me normally use it and transfer data without an internet connection and perhaps supported KDE Connect (considering their price tag), I might have considered buying one instead of just improvising a water resistant cover on a raspberry pi camera.

!success

I think I should start checking if a poster has a history of regularly deleting posts/comments, before trying to give a useful answer.

For some reason, I read that as “15kg ring”.

Although, she might have meant 5k rings. 3 of them. 1 for her, 1 for him and 1 for whomsoever they are going to adulterate with.

There’s ambiguity in the above conversation.

1. The original post tells me that SWF has made the software and is giving it to ACQ; ACQ is asking SG for modification.

2. @[email protected] seems to understand it this way: ACQ has made the software and is giving it to SWF and wants SG to do further modifications.

3. The comment that I am replying to, won’t make @[email protected] (who is assuming [2.]) realise [1.].

The Maths HOD was my professor.

The author might even have read it after handing over a copy.

But that doesn’t make, the “people who wrote them” having ‘read the articles’, because the “author” in this case is more like an “Editor”.

Yeah, that might make it easier when he feels the need to report the professor to the HOD.
Except it doesn’t matter when the HOD just wants to shit on you, because they can just say that you are good at AI-ing and that’s how you did it.

In other words, if one doesn’t have power, they aren’t a pacifist, just weak.
Only once they have the ability to decimate the enemy, do they get to claim that they didn’t use said ability.

That’s cryptographically signed and therefore strong evidence of what you wrote when, and what you were thinking.

This logic doesn’t work out in the given place.

Cryptographical signatures are used to determine that the thingy was made by the person you trust.
Problem is, in this case, the creator of those commits is the one that is not being trusted.

The professor will just go, “Oh you made it with AI and then used git commit!”.

I have had a similar experience in the past, where I made some MATLAB code for a Mathematics course, which the professor said I had copied from someone else (pre-AI times), because he had given the same assignment to other people in the university. This, he claimed without even looking at what I made and without remembering the specific question he had passed to me.

Yeah, that’s right.

But are enough of the AI generation people going to understand the difference?
I feel like, due to the reduction of quality expectations, they will just end up feeling the same about this as we do about the previous one, despite the difference being visible as night and day for us.

Hey, 5 years ago, they couldn’t even solve a HackerRank preliminary coding challenge.

The only problem I see with AI CEOs is that the biggest models will be available to those that already have loads of money, so the adversarial investors get to win.

What’s the problem with the Anthropic one?
Of course everyone wants more W cubes! No?

But hey, at least when you tell them their mistake, they say, “You are absolutely correct!!”

I remember when postman used to bring little envelopes (sometimes little boxes) to people’s homes and was paid by tax money and the small amount of postal fees we paid.

Should have checked the blame before running clang-format himself.