Whether or not you said you like reading isn’t really applicable. That you find books complicated and want a computer to dumb it down for you to the extent that you maybe can’t read a book anymore is indicative of the mental acuity you are capable of bringing to a conversation or task.

Critical thinking is an exercise that one must keep up with, regardless of interest, if one is to be able to maintain effectiveness of it. Supplanting one’s own capabilities with a regression model will cause one’s abilities to atrophy and further a dependence on that algorithm regardless of its own incremental improvements.

Books are not inherently complicated. They make them for kids. The fact you find them thus is an indicator of your own lack of ability.

Hooo Boy, that is not the take you think it is.

• Excessive resource use for what it can produce thereby negatively impacting the broader environment
• Excessive noise and heat pollutants (among others if generating power locally) thereby negatively impacting local environments
• Used for trivial things that could generally be done faster or more accurately by a human
• Places the levers of available knowledge and social influence in the hands of a few powerful men
• Excessive use supplants your trained ability to critically think which can make you more dependent upon them in the future
• The generic LLMs we have today are being invested in at the expense of investments in other technologies which could have a greater positive impact
• People are losing their jobs to a machine that does it worse in a society with no recourse for protecting human life

Chatgpt, as made available by the first search result for “chatgpt.” I chose this approach to match your claim you chose to repeat without verification.

I am not going to cross shop stochastic regressions with an English LUT in order to find one that works better for math just to appease your suspiciously wheel ladened goal post.

I have to use them for work. Even the cloud hosted ones (which are arguably better than self hosted as they can have more resources thrown at them) need all of their output reviewed. They just aren’t up to the level of code generation as a senior dev yet (and if you think they are, I feel sorry for how unskilled your team is).

That is a testable claim. I just had it calculate the force of gravity between 2 objects and it was wrong by virtue of rounding incorrectly. That’s like highschool level math.

An illegal blockade, bombing cities, preventing aid workers from coming in, pirating citizen flotillas, and bulldozing groves is indeed deliberate.

How does seeing something equate to celebration, recognition, or solemnization?

I wasn’t responding to your mention of ads, I was responding to your assertion that there weren’t overblown sensationalists at the same time you liked specific channels.

Yeah, of course they weren’t of the same quality, but during that same time period they both existed and were more popular than the one’s you mentioned. Fred was pulling in double digit millions of views on most of his videos for a couple years. That’s more than what could be said for any of the creators you listed.

Of the channels you highlighted as positive the only one that competes with Fred is TomSka with the asdfmovies, and those were spaced a year apart. Hell, Hawp, 5sf, and Nathan Barnatt never broke 10M views and rarely even broke 1M. Furthermore, TomSka in asdfmovie is overblown sensationalism.

What I’m attempting to highlight is that the platform has always had it’s cringeworthy creators and that your rose-tinted glasses don’t automatically elevate the creators you personally liked to popular status. That’s not a bad thing per se, but obnoxious sensationalist creators operating at the same time as your preferred channels (and thus in your perceived glory days) were bigger and more popular than those you mentioned.

Overblown people acting fake and sensationalist (that try so hard to be funny when they aren’t)

This has been there almost since the beginning; case and point:

• Annoying Orange
• Fred
• Boxxy

Raping someone gets you nothing more than a charge when compared to masterbation. You don’t win your victim; you don’t ascend in class; you don’t get more money, jobs, or opportunity; you don’t even get a partner that appreciates you.

Rape is not a benefit to men, it literally gets you nothing positive. It’s illegal because it causes harm.

This isn’t capitalisms fault.

After reading this atrocious insight into your mind, it’s obvious to me why women don’t respect you.

You’re right, how can we simplify that into a usable insite?

Prioritize erecting “neat” towers then moving the largest disk not placed in the previous step?

Source tower has odd disks? Move top piece to destination tower. Otherwise, move it to the top of the off tower. Always move the largest disk you can that wasn’t placed in your previous move.

Even the “mild/benign” meaning generally carries a tone of positivity (like a store clerk is trained to be affable–even at their worst they’ll still be polite) so it’s not an exact literal fit here.

I was using it more as a tongue and cheek jab attempting to highlight more than just the inadequacies, but to paint them as non-threatening. Obviously that’s not case, the US did carry out strikes in Iran and has certainly been threatening both in language and act.

In a more professional setting devoid of my joke attempt I would have probably used “inept.”

Maybe so. Tbh, I haven’t delved into the specific ordinances, but at most you’d really only be able to affect local elections.

Yeah, was going for the “mild/benign” meaning.

Basically, “the greatest military in the world, which has NeVeR lOsT a WaR, couldn’t keep the straight that was already open open, lost several planes, and had multiple bases struck.”

That military seems mild or benign.

Yeah, was going for the “mild/benign” meaning.

Basically, “the greatest military in the world, which has NeVeR lOsT a WaR, couldn’t keep the straight that was already open open, lost several planes, and had multiple bases struck.”

That military seems mild or benign.

So Trump, in his racist fury, canceled an existing plan that prevented Iran from producing nuclear weapons and permitted rigorous investigations. While this plan did grant access to several billion dollars those funds were either Iranian funds formerly frozen as part of prior sanctioned nuclear activities or repayments for a trade deal the US had failed to uphold their side of.

To replace this deal, “No new wars” Trump started a new war which ended up closing one of the world’s most influential shipping lanes, revealed to Iran how easy it is to close that shipping lane, revealed to the world how affable the US military is, lost the war he started and will have to actually pay reparations in an amount double the number of funds the Obama plan gave access to. The end result of this will be that Iran has fewer restrictions (though still no nuclear weapon), more money, and greater respect in the region.

Trump will still claim he got a better deal.

You didn’t search for how to do something though.

And the most recent release was about 5 months ago.

Also carbs are significantly older tech than 5 months, 1 year, or even 9 years ago.

Also also the average age of a car in the US is about 12.5 years old.

Also also also why the fuck would you not include the model of your car when searching for information about your car.

This just reads like you not understanding something, misattributing it to something else, then producing a non sequitur as an analogy.

Edit: You could always sort by recently uploaded if you genuinely want new videos about 5 month old software, but you’ll be greeted with a lot of slop and irrelevant content. Could it possibly be that the algorithm surfaced the most relevant content for your vague post? It can’t surface things that don’t exist after all.

It’d be my partner’s judgment I’d be forced to recon with.