• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    This logic will elect Republicans again and they will make the situation worse.

    Which is why the wing of the party that capitulates to republicans keeps doing it.

    • Kindness is Punk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Democrats in safe seats capitulate and deserve all the criticism they get but not all Democrats want the stairs quo. Minnesota just passed a wealth tax that they have been using to find better public education and free school lunches. New York Mayor Mamdani has been doing amazing things and New Jersey just elected a progressive.

      Positive change is possible we just need more progressives.

      • ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        People like you focus on the 1-2 progressive people who get elected on suckering people like you who put them on a pedestal while you ignore the other several 100 democrats who are fine with genocide and act like this is progress.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sorry, in a conversation about mass incineration of civilians as part of a mass genocide, you’re talking about school lunches? Could you, for one single second, just pretend you think Palestinians are human.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Democrats in safe seats capitulate and deserve all the criticism they get but not all Democrats want the stairs quo.

        Which is why I referred specifically to a wing of the democratic party and not the whole thing.

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          the problem is that they’re not in control of the democratic party; the capitulators are.

            • eldavi@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              which means that they will not give progressives control of the party.

                • eldavi@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  so why advocate voting for progressive democrats when moderate democrats will not allow any progressive members to control the democrat party?

                  you’re just going to end up w a bernie, aoc, omar, etc. situation where they’re not given enough control to change anything the democratic party’s priorities; but trotted out like show ponys to convince progressives to vote for the democrats anyways.

                  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    so why advocate voting for progressive democrats when moderate democrats will not allow any progressive members to control the democrat party?

                    Because the centrist wing has lost all credibility and we’re seeing their power to block progressives waning.