• jacksilver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s an issue you can run into with many classics. Either they did something so well it’s become a trope, or the artistry in it has been refined so much that the original feels like a poor imitation.

    A great example in film is Citizen Cane. It used a lot of ground breaking approaches for cinematography and sound design, but those things aren’t ground breaking anymore, so watching it now doesn’t have the same “excitement”. A more modern example might be Toy Story; the animation doesn’t look too impressive by modern standards, but was ground breaking at the time.

    • arctanthrope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      yeah I had something similar with the Beatles, where literally my first memory of music is Abbey Road, so my whole life I was like, I don’t get the hype, that’s just what music sounds like. it was only recently I went and listened to the album again with context of what other music from the 60s was like, and I finally realized that they were truly doing some wild shit with songwriting and production

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Funnily enough that’s exactly why I think the Beatles are just mediocre. Literally sticking out was all they needed to do, since literally nothing was good. In this day and age it’s just not good music, even if it might be a classic.

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            According to my Spotify wrapped I listened to over 400 genres, and 1200 artists last year, so no, I’m pretty positive I don’t have narrow taste, even in the slightest.