not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Fuck AI@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agocaiba :3lemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up1265arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1262arrow-down1imagecaiba :3lemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Fuck AI@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square8fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarekkj@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·3 months agoIf the false positive rate is lower than random chance, it could still be useful for finding vulnerabilities. Just have a human confirm and fix them. And run it locally on solar power.
minus-squareatomicbocks@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 months agoThat’s not the point. The point is that anybody can use it to find vulnerabilities, even if exploiting them and not fixing them is the goal.
minus-squarekkj@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoSure, but that’s true of open-source software in general, and it still ends up being more secure than the alternative in most cases.
If the false positive rate is lower than random chance, it could still be useful for finding vulnerabilities. Just have a human confirm and fix them. And run it locally on solar power.
That’s not the point. The point is that anybody can use it to find vulnerabilities, even if exploiting them and not fixing them is the goal.
Sure, but that’s true of open-source software in general, and it still ends up being more secure than the alternative in most cases.
deleted by creator