Online content producer MrBeast’s company wrongfully terminated a female staffer shortly after she returned from maternity leave, the woman said in a lawsuit alleging a sexist culture that pressured her to join a conference call from the labor and delivery room.

The staffer, Lorrayne Mavromatis, said company leadership subjected her to sexual harassment, demoted her after she complained internally about the harassment, and expected her to continue working during her parental leave in violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act.

The company, MrBeastYouTube LLC, had no policy for maternity leave and failed to inform her of her rights under the FMLA after she notified a manager of her pregnancy and said she would need to take leave, according to the complaint filed Wednesday in the US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina.

  • Velma@lemmy.todayOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Are you really blaming the woman here?

    Millions of people work for evil employers. Would you ask the same of an Amazon employee?

    • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think that’s a very uncharitable take on the post.

      Whereas that lexical interpretation exists, I think OP’s point is “why would anyone work for MrBeast” as opposed to “why did this particular person work for him”.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s a difference when you are talking about working for a large faceless corporation, and when you’re talking about working for an individual. It’s like the difference between working for the US government, vs being Donald Trump’s assistant.

      • Velma@lemmy.todayOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        2 months ago

        Mr Beast employs about 500 people.

        I really don’t think the fault lies with the employee here.

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes, I ask the same of Amazon employees. But, only rhetorically, to make people think. Realistically, we’re forced into working for evil people, and therefore, we’re all forced to compromise on our morals just to feed ourselves. We’ve allowed the billionaire capitalists to take over the world–people who are completely devoid of empathy and morals. We get what we tolerate.

      • Velma@lemmy.todayOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        2 months ago

        What the actual fuck is happening in here.

        This woman was told to work while she was laboring and birthing a child.

        And it’s her fault?

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          What the actual fuck is happening in here.

          I think what happened is you read a rhetorical phrase from one poster and interpreted as a literally condemnation of this specific woman. Someone else mostly pointed this out to you, and you doubled down again on your exaggerated misinterpretation.

          • Velma@lemmy.todayOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            The overwhelming opinion in here is that the woman in the article should not have been surprised at this treatment and it’s her fault for working for Mr. Beast.

            She has rights as an employee and she has every right to take him to court over her treatment while employed with him.

            Y’all just can’t resist blaming a victim.

            • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              The overwhelming opinion in here is that the woman in the article should not have been surprised

              True.

              at this treatment and it’s her fault for working for Mr. Beast.

              False.

              The assignment of fault has been only you saying that. No one else is. You are interpreting what others are saying as they are assigning fault. That is an error in your interpretation.

              She was rights as an employee and she has every right to take him to court of her treatment while employed with him.

              She does have rights, and she absolutely can take the company to court. If the claims are are indeed substantiated its should be a pretty easy slam dunk in her favor too.

              Y’all just can’t resist blaming a victim.

              Again, fault and blame are your words here. No one else is saying that.

              • Velma@lemmy.todayOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                2 months ago

                Why would you even ever start working for him?

                We get what we tolerate.

                You work for someone named Mr Beast. How is anyone surprised that a young YouTuber is a jerk?

                Gets job with asshole, wonders why asshole is asshole.

                • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  We’re reading the same words, but you’re injecting more into it than is there.

                  If the allegations are true, the fault is with MrBeast. The blame would be MrBeast’s. What those lines are saying is the the risk something like this may occur is higher with MrBeast that with many other employers, and that the person chose either chose that risk knowingly, or shouldn’t be surprised when the risk turned out badly.

                  • Velma@lemmy.todayOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    10
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    It’s like asking why a woman chose to walk down a dark alley after she got raped.

      • Velma@lemmy.todayOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        2 months ago

        So it’s ok for Amazon and other companies to mistreat their employees because it’s the employees fault for needing a job?

          • Velma@lemmy.todayOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            Why would you even ever start working for him?

            I still wouldn’t blame an Amazon employee for Amazon violating their employment rights regardless of how I feel about Amazon as an employer.

            We all need to pay bills and eat. That doesn’t mean this woman is at fault for how her employer treated her while she was giving birth.

              • Velma@lemmy.todayOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                You gonna put food on their table?

                Why is your first instinct to criticize the employee and not the employer?