Hmm… candor toward the tribunal is an essential affirmative duty under MRPC, every state bar’s, rules of professional conduct, the federal rules of professional conduct, as well as the ABA’s rules of professional conduct.
This dismissal implicates the prosecution‘s representations to the grand jury, which would make the transcripts discoverable during disciplinary hearings.
Hmm… candor toward the tribunal is an essential affirmative duty under MRPC, every state bar’s, rules of professional conduct, the federal rules of professional conduct, as well as the ABA’s rules of professional conduct.
This dismissal implicates the prosecution‘s representations to the grand jury, which would make the transcripts discoverable during disciplinary hearings.
And the judge won’t hold them accountable, guaranteed.
Disciplinary actions for attorneys are not judicial hearings.
The public officials will never even be threatened with retribution.