• bthest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Because something is ‘natural’ does not mean that its moral.

    • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Never said it was moral. I said it was specifically amoral, as in “has nothing to do with your arbitrary sense of morality”. Try reading again.

      • quips@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I have trouble understanding how it could be amoral. Every time you eat meat you are making the choice to contribute to crimes than the holocaust? Who, without your contribution, would have a reduced capacity to commit suffering.