Understood, and than you for posting. But now it just serves as misinformation to people scrolling through their feed. Upvoting would only contribute to people being confused.
“Applicants are not entitled to a stay of an adverse court order based on lost profits from their criminal enterprise. They cannot, in any legally relevant sense, be irreparably harmed by a court order that makes it more difficult for them to commit crimes,”
Calling a pharmaceutical company a criminal enterprise and suggesting all abortions are illegal conduct sure is something from him.
"They cannot, in any legally relevant sense, be irreparably harmed by a court order that makes it more difficult for them to commit crimes,”
Unless of course it’s the Trump administration committing the crimes. Then even slowing them down and maintaining the original status quo while the courts adjudicate the case is causing irreparable harm.
The ban was allowed to take effect for a short while which is when I originally posted. There’s an update in the notes and in the linked article.
Understood, and than you for posting. But now it just serves as misinformation to people scrolling through their feed. Upvoting would only contribute to people being confused.
Alito’s dissent is interesting to note:
“Applicants are not entitled to a stay of an adverse court order based on lost profits from their criminal enterprise. They cannot, in any legally relevant sense, be irreparably harmed by a court order that makes it more difficult for them to commit crimes,”
Calling a pharmaceutical company a criminal enterprise and suggesting all abortions are illegal conduct sure is something from him.
Unless of course it’s the Trump administration committing the crimes. Then even slowing them down and maintaining the original status quo while the courts adjudicate the case is causing irreparable harm.