What started as a widely backed proposal to locate a new Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum on the National Mall devolved into a partisan fight Thursday after Republicans revised the legislation to ensure no transgender people are included in the exhibits.

The House rejected the bill, 204-216, an outcome that leaves the next steps uncertain. The revised bill also would ban a “diversity” of views and give President Donald Trump the final say on where the museum would be located.

“It was a simple bill. You kind of ruined it with your trans obsession and your culture wars,” Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez, a Democrat from New Mexico and chair of the Democratic Women’s Caucus, said earlier in the week.

But Republicans argued it was Democrats who were overreacting to the changes and now threatening progress toward establishing the long-sought women’s museum in the nation’s capital.

Republican Rep. Nicole Malliotakis of New York, the bill’s chief sponsor, said “it’s a disgrace” that Democrats would be standing in the way of the bill’s passage.

“Perhaps the party that is opposing a women’s history museum on the National Mall because they want to have transgender exhibits — maybe they are the ones who are trans obsessed,” Malliotakis said.

In the final tally, a handful of Republicans voted against the bill, joining Democrats who led the opposition. The chamber came to a standstill as GOP leaders scrounged for support from their ranks.

      • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        It’s a poison pill. This is a common bad faith tactic in politics in general, to “make” the other side vote against something, and here it’s clearly being done by the Republicans.

        • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          I did, republicans just had to attempt to add anti-trans legislation. It was going to pass before that. Did you want Dems to agree with anti-trans legislation for some reason?

          • Psionicsickness@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            “In the final tally, a handful of Republicans voted against the bill, joining Democrats who led the opposition. The chamber came to a standstill as GOP leaders scrounged for support from their ranks.“

            And I could give a shit about trans issues. Never met one in real life, sounds like everyone is just fighting over like, 12 attention seekers.

            That being said, idgaf what an adult does, chop your weenie off, power to you.

              • Psionicsickness@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 days ago

                Ok. I’ve litterally never had a bad word to say about trans people. You do you boo. However, this is like having a black history museum and then blocking it because Asians weren’t part of it. Make a trans history museum. You could have exhibits that go all the way back to 2005. Lmao

                • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  15 days ago

                  You just said that the “12” trans people are “attention seeking”, and then in this very post are trying to claim that trans people have only been around since 2005. We’ve been around the entire time, we just get shit on by transphobic idiots like yourself and minimized by history.

                  Never had a bad word to say my ass, you’re pathetic.

                • CubitOom@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  15 days ago

                  This is a bad analogy, and it shows that you are either not paying attention to the facts are are a troll.

                  It would be closer to saying that, by a Republican amended law, Asians aren’t allowed in the new black history Museum.

            • Bonesince1997@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              15 days ago

              Except you also don’t care why things happened. Called it wrong. And then proudly stood behind bigotry. I bet you call it like you see it, huh.

  • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Don’t let that rapist have any involvement in such a museum, it will be permanently tainted. How fucking about we wait until this damn country elects a woman president before we build a fucking museum under the most anti-women regime in US history?? About to let them make a damn handmaids tale breed mare “museum”, fuck. These bastards can choke on my menstrual blood clots.