What started as a widely backed proposal to locate a new Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum on the National Mall devolved into a partisan fight Thursday after Republicans revised the legislation to ensure no transgender people are included in the exhibits.

The House rejected the bill, 204-216, an outcome that leaves the next steps uncertain. The revised bill also would ban a “diversity” of views and give President Donald Trump the final say on where the museum would be located.

“It was a simple bill. You kind of ruined it with your trans obsession and your culture wars,” Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez, a Democrat from New Mexico and chair of the Democratic Women’s Caucus, said earlier in the week.

But Republicans argued it was Democrats who were overreacting to the changes and now threatening progress toward establishing the long-sought women’s museum in the nation’s capital.

Republican Rep. Nicole Malliotakis of New York, the bill’s chief sponsor, said “it’s a disgrace” that Democrats would be standing in the way of the bill’s passage.

“Perhaps the party that is opposing a women’s history museum on the National Mall because they want to have transgender exhibits — maybe they are the ones who are trans obsessed,” Malliotakis said.

In the final tally, a handful of Republicans voted against the bill, joining Democrats who led the opposition. The chamber came to a standstill as GOP leaders scrounged for support from their ranks.

  • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    I did, republicans just had to attempt to add anti-trans legislation. It was going to pass before that. Did you want Dems to agree with anti-trans legislation for some reason?

    • Psionicsickness@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      “In the final tally, a handful of Republicans voted against the bill, joining Democrats who led the opposition. The chamber came to a standstill as GOP leaders scrounged for support from their ranks.“

      And I could give a shit about trans issues. Never met one in real life, sounds like everyone is just fighting over like, 12 attention seekers.

      That being said, idgaf what an adult does, chop your weenie off, power to you.

      • Bonesince1997@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Except you also don’t care why things happened. Called it wrong. And then proudly stood behind bigotry. I bet you call it like you see it, huh.

        • Psionicsickness@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          28 days ago

          Ok. I’ve litterally never had a bad word to say about trans people. You do you boo. However, this is like having a black history museum and then blocking it because Asians weren’t part of it. Make a trans history museum. You could have exhibits that go all the way back to 2005. Lmao

          • CubitOom@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            This is a bad analogy, and it shows that you are either not paying attention to the facts are are a troll.

            It would be closer to saying that, by a Republican amended law, Asians aren’t allowed in the new black history Museum.

              • CubitOom@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                28 days ago

                It would mean that anyone that is black and also has Asian heritage would not be allowed to be in the museum. So yeah, it would be a bad rule to add at the last second for no reason outside of bigotry.

            • Psionicsickness@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              28 days ago

              Fair enough. I too think a women’s museum is unnecessarily gendered. But these are the times we live in. Lost is the age of the melting pot, now it’s all about the individual.

          • CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            28 days ago

            You just said that the “12” trans people are “attention seeking”, and then in this very post are trying to claim that trans people have only been around since 2005. We’ve been around the entire time, we just get shit on by transphobic idiots like yourself and minimized by history.

            Never had a bad word to say my ass, you’re pathetic.