Tulsi Gabbard has resigned as President Donald Trump’s director of national intelligence, saying she needed to leave office as her husband battles cancer.
That just links to an archive.today of it. I tried doing it myself on that site before posting that, and it kept trying and didn’t work. I checked that site also and they didn’t have any other solutions. I guess someone got it to work.
I’m not sure the reports do conflict. What the reports say do conflict, but at their base level, they are just reports of what different people are claiming.
Do you really think I’m not aware of the implications here and the fact that president and every member of his admin are chronically dishonest? All I’ve done is note what different outlets are reporting. Thanks though, I’ll try to “use my brain”.
Pretty obviously you were implying that it was not due to her husband’s health, but rather that Trump wanted her out, as the supposed insider said. Sure, I believe that. I’d even go further and ask who gave this probably Russian agent’s husband rare bone cancer.
A Reuters article I read did not say that. It claimed troomp said she “did a great job”.
https://www.removepaywalls.com/
https://www.removepaywalls.com/https://www.reuters.com/world/us/gabbard-resigns-trumps-national-intelligence-director-fox-news-digital-reports-2026-05-22/
That just links to an archive.today of it. I tried doing it myself on that site before posting that, and it kept trying and didn’t work. I checked that site also and they didn’t have any other solutions. I guess someone got it to work.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/gabbard-resigns-trumps-national-intelligence-director-fox-news-digital-reports-2026-05-22/
Well, there’s the answer as to why Reuters is reporting that?
Use your brain. Why are there conflicting reports?
I’m not sure the reports do conflict. What the reports say do conflict, but at their base level, they are just reports of what different people are claiming.
Huh!?
It’s pretty clear
It’s very not.
So you just conveniently opted out of quoting the last part, chose to argue about that choice, and you’re going to triple down?
Do you really think I’m not aware of the implications here and the fact that president and every member of his admin are chronically dishonest? All I’ve done is note what different outlets are reporting. Thanks though, I’ll try to “use my brain”.
You seem to be unaware of what I was asking, whether intentional or not I’m not sure.
Pretty obviously you were implying that it was not due to her husband’s health, but rather that Trump wanted her out, as the supposed insider said. Sure, I believe that. I’d even go further and ask who gave this probably Russian agent’s husband rare bone cancer.
Pretty obviously I was not implying anything, I was attempting to find the truth.
“Just asking questions”, huh?