Wildly disrespectful to any artist that ever lived. I’m all up for sharing alternatives that are good/better towards actual artists. Still evaluating my choices, but meanwhile this seems like the only and rather easy signal the streaming community can give as to spread the word if they agree (next to stopping your own subscription). Context: https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/22/spotifys-ai-bet-more-of-everything-less-of-what-you-want/
All of my musician friends (3) do all their paid music creation live, and aren’t on Spotify. So, they couldn’t tell me their motivation for being on Spotify is; none of them have ever complained about piracy.
That’s not the evidence I asked for, those are canned statement from Spotify. Do you believe everything Spotify says? They have misled people about their motives before.
Still, thanks for an least engaging with the premise.
Ratio. They don’t sound like very successful artists lmao
I wonder why they wouldn’t be on Spotify if it’s so good for artists? 🤔
Please explain what you mean by “canned statement” exactly? Is a factual statement not relevant if it comes from someone you don’t like?
By “canned” I mean “made palatable for the masses and packaged compactly”.
Those statements aren’t evidence any more than your claims are. For evidence, we would need some measurements of reality.
Spotify wouldn’t be the first company to claim “piracy” as their motivation even tho their actions leave the rate of piracy virtually unchanged, so I do doubt their motivational claims. But, it’s also not what I asked for. I want to see if there was an actual observable effect on piracy that has anything to do with Spotify.