List of Hard Drives That Need To Be Checked
Rep. Danny Williams
Rep. Justin Humphrey
Rep. Derrick Hildebrant
Rep. Warren Hamilton
Rep. Mark McBride
Rep. John George
Rep. Chris Sneed
Rep. David Hardin
Rep. Ronny Johns
Rep. Josh Cantrell
Rep. Jon Echols
Rep. Marcus McEntire
Rep. Tom Gann
Rep. Cody Maynard
Rep. Kevin West
Rep. Neil Hays
Rep. Rande Worthen
Rep. Brad Boles
Rep. Todd Russ
Rep. Ken Luttrell
Rep. Randy Randleman
Rep. Clay Staires
Rep. Ty Burns
Rep. Rusty Cornwell
Rep. Mark Vancuren
Rep. Eddy Dempsey
Rep. Mike Dobrinski
Rep. Gerrid Kendrix
Rep. Brian Hill
Rep. Dell Kerbs
Rep. Dick Lowe
Rep. Jim Grego
Rep. Kent Peterson
Rep. Kevin McDugle
Rep. Trey Caldwell
Rep. Ellyn Hefner
Reddit would have just removed it with no warning and no offer to let them correct it. 😉
Who are you even helping by enforcing this? The people on the list?
Nothing to do with the content, we don’t allow editorializing in headlines, full stop. The content is immaterial.
it was literally impossible to edit titles on reddit. it was a stupid rule there anyways, but good for you for clearing that bar despite the fact that the bar is underground
This is a really weird hill to die on.
what, child abuse? i was abused as a kid so yeah maybe i’m a little weird about it, sorry if that’s the case
That’s a cool straw man you’ve got there, gonna put him out in a field?
huh?
https://helpfulprofessor.com/straw-man-fallacy-examples/
this is a story about child abuse, which i’ve got a lot of trauma around, so it’s likely that i’m acting weird about it, i don’t understand how acknowledging that is a straw man. you just said i was acting weird and i was like “yeah probably”
although i still think the rule is stupid, as i wrote, the opinions of the article author isn’t more valid than the opinion of whoever shared the article and the author’s title and many more words are just a click away
Your comment came off more like you were stating that child abuse wasn’t a weird hill to die on. If our wires got crossed, I apologize.
Well, it’s an interesting meta discussion anyway.
Point of the rule is multi-faceted:
I was there on Reddit when the original rule was created. Like in the thread. And it’s a good rule.
If OP wants to write another article, and publish it with a new title, go for it.
The rule has nothing to do with this one particular instance of an actual good editorialized title. I like it. But I don’t agree with posting it over the story author’s title.
🤣🤣🤣