• chris@l.roofo.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I was going to sell my two 16 GB DDR4 kits but then I thought “what if my current kit breaks”. Better safe than a few bucks richer.

  • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 hours ago

    That’s it, time to do some sketchy shit…

    I’m gonna need some wire, a soldering kit, and all the DDR3 I can find.

  • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Oh, so my audacious pessimism was correct, buying 32gb DDR5 now despite the cost was actually easier than doing it later.

    Not thrilled. Not the worst thing I’ve ever been right about, though.

    • eleijeep@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s a huge gamble but Valve surely has enough liquid capital to be able to subsidise the price to get more gamers buying games on Steam instead of in the Playstation, Xbox and Nintendo Switch stores. It could be the best possible year in gaming history if they make it the most attractive option for gamers.

      The risk for Valve is that people buy the machine simply to use as a general purpose PC, but the specs are surely low enough that it’s only a small segment of the PC market that would find it useful. It’s not an AI accelerator or a high performance workstation.

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 hours ago

        They aren’t going to do that for one very good reason: it’s a PC. And unlike the Steam Deck it’s actually in a PC form factor.

        If they sold the Steam Machine at a loss, what’s to stop companies from buying a bunch of them to use as workstations? Those units wouldn’t be bringing any game sales to Valve, so they’d have no way to recoup costs.