• Gen_Euffe@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Nice. Now, Google will probably just disable AI overview in germany cause they know they can’t make it not spew made up crap. The hope’s on more countries following suit on this.

      • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        And according to German law, only if you had actual damages from it.
        And you don’t get a payout that’ll make you rich, you’ll just get awarded a financial amount that covers those damages.
        (After winning in court against Google’s lawyers, of course)

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Correct and common sense ruling. The tech broligarchs can’t buy the judiciary in other countries like they do here in the US.

  • OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I should do a bunch of google searches about myself and see if I can get its AI to say anything defamatory about me…

  • derAbsender@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    “because it alone has influence over the AI’s offering and the algorithms with which the AI operates.”

    Okay so anything someone generates with the AI is owned by the company?

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s like speeding with a stolen car.

      You are responsible for the speeding fine, but it does not mean the car is yours.

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Well, I’m afraid that, unfortunately, this ruling will ultimately never be enforced, as it would make it impossible for the powerful multibillion-dollar corporations to operate this business.

    Another example of just how influential these corporations are is the fact that the most profitable piracy operation in history is even possible. Gigantic corporations of major influence have already filed multiple lawsuits over blatant intellectual property theft—yet even these players clearly stood no chance against the concentrated capital that is preventing the AI bubble from bursting immediately.

    Therefore: It is the right decision, but it will almost certainly remain without consequence.

    • quick_snail@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Nah, it’s like how they fined them hundreds of millions of euros because it was 2 clicks on YouTube to block cookies (the law required 1 click).

      The result was that EU visitors to YouTube got 1 click “deny all” button for cookies. Else they’d be fined over-and-over.

      The same will happen here. Google will remove AI summaries in Germany. And the German people will be less stupid because of it.

      Hopefully this spreads to the whole EU, and then other progressive countries too

      • DandomRude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I don’t think this can be handled as easily as with cookies or third-party connections that require consent, because Google apparently plans to eventually replace the traditional search engine results pages (SERPs) entirely with an AI chat interface.

        In that case, they would have to offer a completely different product just for Germany, or leave this market altogether. Neither option is likely to be viable for Google.

        Setting up the AI chat so that it doesn’t provide dangerous answers is, in my opinion, also out of the question, since this can never be guaranteed due to the way LLMs work.

        • quick_snail@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          If they did that, then they’ll be fined constantly.

          The point is that they shouldn’t be doing that. We, as a international community, need to make that illegal.

          And this is the first stone for that.

          • DandomRude@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            45 minutes ago

            Yes, absolutely. I completely agree with you, but unfortunately, for the reasons mentioned, I still think it’s unlikely that this welcome ruling will have any real impact.

            Please don’t get me wrong. I’m just being realistic. This is by no means an argument against holding the tech giants accountable—we absolutely should!