• Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    They are just regular black sneakers with a bit of peach coloring. I mean, the guy clearly sucks. Not interesting at all.

    • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you like this design, check out the designs by their last partner. Helped their multibillion dollar corporation make record profits! And in the end, isn’t that what it’s all about? Blindly supporting which ever titan of capitalism panders to your worldview, as if wearing over-priced shoes constructed with third world sweatshop labor is Marxist because the designer posed for his profile pic in a CCCP shirt?

  • Stefan_S_from_H@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Oh, that’s rough. They are the official supplier of the German national soccer team, starting next year.

    Germany has a good relationship with Ukraine.

    I’m terrible at predicting shitstorms. This has the potential but will probably get ignored. Unless Adidas and Puma pay some PR firm to start one.

    • baines@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      if the years of sweatshops didn’t discourage profits not sure why people think this will

      • quill7513@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Adidas was founded in the 1920s in Germany and remained in operation throughout the 1930s and 40s if that helps clue you in

          • quill7513@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            all of the major athletic shoe brands are up to shady shit because they profit from slave labor in the global south.

            • nike donates to conservatives in the US
            • adidas (who owns reebok) and asics furnish discounts to the IDF
            • puma stays out of politics directly, but should still be side eyed for how fairly their laborers are compensated. of the majors they probably win the “most least evil” award
            • under armour’s founders have been very active promoters of CPAC
            • new balance has a recent legacy of their ceo backing conservatives in the US but has since replaced him. side eye them
            • brooks outright provides shoes to the IDF

            the only shoe companies that i feel genuinely comfortably recommending:

            • luna sandals
            • enda running shoes
            • veja
            • wildling
            • xero if you’re into court sports like pickleball or basketball
            • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              What about Wolverine/Saucony? I don’t seem to be able to find anything out about their labour or politics practices.

              • quill7513@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                i don’t have anything specific on them. i’ve bought plenty of altra’s so clearly i’m not above buying wolverine

                • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  It’s currently my go-to brand (helps that they actually fit my foot type and terrain use), but as I was reviewing runner manufacturers and their social stances, I realized that while Nike and Adidas are relatively transparent about what they do so they’re easy to critique, Wolverine seems to be more in a “don’t ask / don’t tell” space — which could mean they’re actually just as bad or worse than the others.