In ‘The Three Body Problem’, we see a prominent scholar and professor being publicly beaten by the communist party for not denying God’s existence. He goes on to say that ‘Science hasn’t provided any definitive answer’. So I’m curious, <title>.
In ‘The Three Body Problem’, we see a prominent scholar and professor being publicly beaten by the communist party for not denying God’s existence. He goes on to say that ‘Science hasn’t provided any definitive answer’. So I’m curious, <title>.
They’re proof that people believed a thing happened. Its not proof the thing happened. Im not saying the letters are forgery, simply they don’t suffice as proof. Why haven’t they showed up in 4k to make the non-believers shut up and save them from hell?
Ddg tells me that catholic hosts refers to communion wafers. Are you saying that there’s cardiac tissue in communion? What source do you have for that claim? Can I genome sequence or clone Jesus then?
they were eyewitness accounts
who gives eyewitness if they BELIEVE it has happened?
eyewitness can only be given if you have seen it happen with your very own eyes
I can say a magician pulled a rabbit out of an empty hat, doesn’t mean there’s actual magic. Belief in your perception is exactly how magic tricks work, eyewitnesses are notoriously unreliable.
Besides the church a singular time has anyone confirmed the appearance of tissue and blood?
the multiple experts, and they have multiple photos.
eyewitnesses and letters and archeological proof is all we have of basically anything that was 2000+ years ago
Rofl
that was just a summary image