You must log in or register to comment.
BIG_IF_TRUEYes, no, maybe, I don’t know, can you repeat the question?
You’re not the boss of me, now!
You’re not the boss of me now! You’re not the boss of me now! You’re not the boss of me now, and you’re not so big! Life is unfair…
Stop singing and get back to work.
I’m curious of what that means, but that link put me through five captchas in a row and I ran out of patience.
Youtube is giving you captchas? Ouch.
It’s a Monty Python sketch. Here it is in text form.
Thanks! I’m on a VPN using graphene, so that’s probably why YouTube doesn’t like me.
May I introduce the VHDL STD library where you can set an output to “don’t care”:
As an embedded electronics engineer discovering VHDL was a blast and a mindfuck!
Don’t worry, VHDL is still a mindfuck sometimes even after being an FPGA engineer for years (mostly only using VHDL). It’s such a cool language, and I am glad you discovered and are enjoying it!
its just what most people what vall illegal state or impossible?
I prefer the classic Bool:
enum Bool { True, False, FileNotFound };Ah yes, the three genders.
If this classic isn’t linked from that Wikipedia article (I never checked) it really should be. Like the “static cling” image, evnen encyclopedias need to know when to step out of formal style. 🤭
Missing the truth nuke
And DAMN_LIE
FAKE_NEWS (true but I don’t like it)
I also propose a new binary operator CARES_ABOUT_YOUR_FEELINGS
MEGABULL ,
and
megabool::Statistics
DOUBLE_PLUS_UNTRUEPANTS_ON_FIRE,While working on some client code, my coworker and I came across a case statement that said something like
if myBoolean == TRUE then blah else if myBoolean == FALSE then blah blah else if myBoolean is null then blah blah blahEver since we’ve always laughed at the “trinary bit”.
Needs more emojis.
👍 = true👎 = false
🫳 = maybe
🤌 = Italian false
I’d have gone with “truthy” and “falsy”, but I like the cut of the jib all the same
megabool is_boy(const Coder *coder);Damn JavaScript
I’m confused as to the use of double true.
I’ve been running a query adding TRUE entries to other TRUE entries, but I just get TRUE as result.
This is just reinvention of Łukasiewicz multi-valued logic
