• Oxysis/Oxy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Once again Valve proves they actually understand what people want; a relatively cheap and effective system that lets people play the games they want to play

    • TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think the big difference is that they seem to be optimizing for customer satisfaction where others are not.

      My favorite example I use often is how the Steam Deck comes with a case. It’s free and there’s not even an option to not get it. They know you need one, they include it. The Switch doesn’t come with a case. They know you need one but they don’t care. You’ll buy one if you want it bad enough and that’s more revenue.

      It’s just a different type of optimization.

          • ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            I had a first gen and bought it at a discount (10% for Newsletter sign up I immediately cancelled after ordering hah). Iirc it cost me about 350€ which was still a lot but compared to what’s going on now…

            Gifted it to my mother for the grandkids because I bought a steamdeck and never used the switch again.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Two things massively help Valve:

      Steam is a goddamned money printing machine, they are the most profitable software company per capita, per employee… possibly bar none.

      Also… they’re not publically traded.

      They do not have investors constantly forcing maximization of short term profits at the cost of literally everything else.

      … So they can afford to … not price gauge everyone.

      • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I honestly don’t understand why most companies aren’t private instead of public. Like which founder looks forward to answering to investors when they could just be answerable to themselves and their employees and maybe board, like are they looking for a massive exit payout by going public or to raise funds to become a bigger company, but I argue if you are making enough to be profitable why chase being bigger