Controlled opposition cries that actual opposition is taking some Ws. Keep them crying. Or just hang them.
“Let”
They’d better
This what you get got not listening. Cry some more. I look forward to the downfall. Socialists will rise because the DNC fell deep into greed.

Status quo democrats right now.

This gif might be the best thing to come out this year.
I think the younger folk taking over the democratic party is a good idea. We all turn more conservative when we get older (especially if we now have more “money” to protect) and the democratic party skews on “dotard”. Just to be clear though, fuck trump.
The entire idea that “we all turn more conservative with age” is completely flawed and very likely completely made up to try to validate that insane ideology and act like conservatism is a wisdom we might gain with age.
Basically, don’t put that evil on me, Ricky Bobby. If you wanna go that way do not try and use others to excuse the poor, ignorant choice.
If anything I’ve grown way more socialist with age. Mostly through life experiences. I’ve been a construction worker, a construction manager and now a CAD Specialist. And through all that, I’ve seen the average worker get fucked over countless times, through wage theft, vacation theft, getting fired for standing up for health and safety, getting fired because the manager needed a scapegoat. All just in persuit of endless growth, to buy some CEO a 3rd vacation home in Turkey.
I’ve seen workers get nickled and dimed and downright cheated, after completing a job in record time, but the companies alway need more profit, no matter the human costs.
I haven’t grown more conservative, I’ve grown angry at the capitalist system, and the only cure is complete ownership by the workers.
One Democratic lawmaker sitting in a battleground district told CNN that they are so concerned about the rise of the Democratic Socialists of America that they have recently begun having serious conversations with donors about leaving the party altogether.
The fact that their impulse is to get their donors opinions instead of their constituents is why they need to be primaries.
leaving the party altogether
Don’t let the door hit you in the ass.
Let them… lol.
“Let them” ? Excuse me?
Mother fucker in a real democracy YOU don’t have any say in the matter. What you’re seeing happen is the will of the people. Yes, you will “let us” vote for the candidates that we want to vote for.
Try to take that away, it’s about all we (barely) have left. See what happens.
The most charitable reading would be “Their positions are winning votes. Are we going to stick to our conservative positions and let them drive us out the party or are we going to adopt their progressive positions in order to retain power?”
I’m not too optimistic though. They might sacrifice principles, but I’m not sure their pride could stomach accepting that their stubborn attempt to win over the right was fundamentally flawed. Nor could their donors stomach it.
Considering all the times they’ve literally worked to attack more progressive members of their own party, even when it would lead to clear loss, I’m not giving the DNC any charity.
Centrists have lost all generosity and instead dessrve only animosity. Worthless conservatives pretending that they aren’t.
American political parties aren’t public institutions, their inner workings are beholden to nobody but their paymasters. It’s a rotten problem so old everyone’s stopped noticing the smell
Democrat Socialists should just form a new party on their own.
Socialists should actually just have a revolution and rewrite the constitution to prevent reactionaries like the DNC and GOP from ever holding political power ever again.
Bad idea. The system in the US is so bad that more than two parties aren’t viable and the brand recognition of the Democratic party is so huge that it’s better to take it over.
Counterpoint, there wasn’t always a dem and Republicans party. There used to be different parties in the two party system. If the brand recognition is good, but it’s seen as bad, then making a new party to turn the existing one fringe isn’t such a crazy idea. Let’s see if it’s actually necessary though
If you can’t take over the Democrats, then you can’t politics.
The problem is that the current two parties have so much money coming in from our oligarchs. That’s why the Republicans have turned to fascism because they were even more susceptible to corruption than a lot of the Democrats.
I don’t know if there’s a single Republican that isn’t beholden to our oligarchs. Maybe there is but I’m just not aware.
I am aware of a couple like AOC and Bernie, who as far as I can tell are really not beholden to the oligarchs.
And that’s also true of this new social Democratic movement.
The problem is that the oligarchs gives so much power to those that they’re able to corrupt that it is an uphill battle, even with the support.
The propaganda countering real progress is so strong because it is so friendly supported by our oligarch.
So I just don’t find a statement like yours fair. Because it’s such an uphill battle and an unfair battle. If it was a fair battle I would agree. They should be able to win if they get support.
But even if they get support, the oligarchs are able to throw so much money against them that I don’t know if we can take over the party. I hope they can but I don’t know if they can
Just call themselves the New Democratic Party. Maybe make their colours orange.
You sneaky Canadian.
“Oh my God! What if they take over and start doing things that actually benefit people?”
Won’t somebody think of the rich donors!?
sharpening guillotine blade
Mmm rich donors.
Who is the party? The constituents or the blowhards at the top and the army of consultants suckling off the teet of their donors? Great litmus test to admit Democratic voters don’t matter. Let’s see how many wanna commit to that.
House Democrats’ anxiety rises after wins by Mamdani-backed candidates: ‘Are we going to let them take over the party?’ | CNN Politics Sarah Ferris, Ellis Kim, Annie Grayer 9 - 11 minutes
Top Democrats insist that they’re unfazed by the party’s forming a “Zohran Mamdani wing,” after the New York City mayor’s stunningly successful primary night.
But there is growing angst among many sitting congressional Democrats after Mamdani allies won three primaries, including defeats of incumbent Reps. Adriano Espaillat and Dan Goldman. And, most immediately, they worry it will make it tougher to flip the House this year, with Republicans eager to tee up the Mamdani slate’s most controversial positions for attack ads in battlegrounds across the country.
“Obviously, the socialists had a big win last night. The question is, are we going to let them take over the party? Or are we going to stand up and fight back?” said Rep. Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey, a moderate Democrat who has criticized Mamdani’s politics and how he’s addressed allies of Israel. “Many of us believe, as I do, that if you’re a socialist, you’re not a Democrat.”
Gottheimer and others worry that Republicans will try to yoke their most vulnerable members to what they see as far-left ultra-progressives — and they worry that it will only highlight Democratic divisions in a must-win election year.
“If you ask me, it was not a good night for New York,” Rep. Greg Meeks, a powerful New York Democrat who is close with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, told CNN when asked about deleted posts from Darializa Avila Chevalier, who defeated Espaillat, expressing support for abolishing police, prisons and borders.
Asked about the fraught relationship between the Democratic Socialists of America and the Democratic Party, Meeks added: “Instead of us making sure we put all of our resources to fight Republicans and to fight Donald Trump, we’re using it to fight each other. It just doesn’t make common sense to me.”
One Democratic lawmaker sitting in a battleground district told CNN that they are so concerned about the rise of the Democratic Socialists of America that they have recently begun having serious conversations with donors about leaving the party altogether.
If Democrats do flip the House, the number of democratic socialists in their ranks is still likely to be a small minority of the caucus. And Democrats remain confident they can still win the House in November.
The House Democratic caucus gathered for a private briefing by their party arm on Wednesday morning, where party leaders presented internal polling showing Trump underwater in key battlegrounds, according to two people familiar with the briefing. No one brought up the Mamdani-backed candidate wins. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries talks with reporters in the Capitol Visitor Center on Wednesday.
The Mamdani-backed candidates who won on Tuesday ran on the same affordability message that the party has embraced nationally, but their victories highlight broader friction over Democrats’ status-quo tactics in Washington — as well as deep divides on Israel.
“Our party nationally will need to reckon with this fact given that what you witnessed yesterday was not an anti-affordability or anti-economic policy strategy that won; it was an anti-establishment strategy beyond messaging that trumped,” a senior House Democratic aide told CNN.
Speaking Wednesday morning in New York City, Mamdani made the opposite argument, though he also connected cost-of-living issues to his longstanding critiques of US military support for Israel, a key issue in all three primaries.
“What we saw last night was a hunger for leaders who will be there on the front lines looking to make it easier for working people to afford life in the greatest city in the world,” he said.
Jeffries on Wednesday downplayed fears within his party that the wins could reverberate in battleground districts this November.
“No, Donald Trump has a working relationship with the mayor of the city of New York, and he’s made that publicly and explicitly clear to America, not once but twice in the Oval Office,” Jeffries said.
Jeffries was asked by reporters if Mamdani had made enemies on Capitol Hill.
“Listen, the mayor and I agreed to strongly disagree about some of his endorsements, and he’s got work to do in terms of the conversations that he’s going to have with members of Congress moving forward,” Jeffries, who backed Espaillat and Goldman, told reporters.
Asked if Democratic voters want their members in Congress to be more progressive, Jeffries responded: “I think we’ve got to look at the totality of all 215 members of the House Democratic caucus, and that answer speaks for itself.”
The Brooklyn representative told reporters his relationship with Madmani[sic] is “a very good one” and that the pair speak regularly.
Jeffries, who famously took months to decide whether to endorse Mamdani in the mayoral primary in his home city, eventually did back the mayor. But not all of his Democratic members from New York did.
Rep. Tom Suozzi, a centrist from Long Island, has been vocal in his critiques of democratic socialists, including Mamdani.
After Tuesday night’s primaries, Suozzi said the victories by the far left have sent a message to mainstream Democrats that they need to do better. But he doesn’t think it calls for a push toward far-left policies.
“It’s a warning that people have got to do a better job. They’ve got to work harder” to prove to voters they have solutions to make life more affordable, Suozzi said. He compared the rise of democratic socialists to the MAGA surge in the GOP.
“I think the bottom line is that the DSA and the far left — as well as the MAGA movement and the far right — are organized, and they’re doing a good job organizing, and they’re tapping into people’s concerns about their economic insecurity. I think Trump did that in his campaigns. I think Mamdani did that in his campaign for mayor. They tapped into people’s real concerns about economic insecurity. I just happen to disagree with their solutions,” he said.
But Morris Katz, a campaign strategist who is a key Mamdani ally, argued that Democrats can have a “big-tent populist party” that focuses on affordability and “invests in domestic priorities, in schools and in hospitals rather than in wars abroad.”
“I think that we spend a lot more time talking about labels than the average swing voter thinks about that,” Katz told CNN’s Dana Bash. “You see people interact with policies, campaigns, and ideas not predicated on the label they’re applying to themselves, but how are they going to make their lives better?”
And on Capitol Hill, progressives like Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna celebrated Tuesday night’s results.
“It’s a big win for the progressive wing of the party. We are a new party that will call out the genocide, tax the billionaires, and stand up for single payer healthcare” Khanna told CNN. “Our party wants a new generation leaders willing to challenge the status quo and call out the establishment.”
But one longtime Democrat, Rep. Vicente Gonzalez of Texas, firmly disagrees that the results reflect the mood of the country.
Instead, he said it’s a small minority of Democrats who have run extremely effective campaigns.
“I think we have a lot of more organizing to do on the ground, especially in places like New York and California, places where DSA is is is being more influential, and we need to educate young people, we need to get more people, young people, involved on more moderate policies, just the way the other side has, and run strong campaigns,” Gonzalez said.
“I don’t think it should be a concern for people in South Texas, but I think nationally it’s a huge concern, and how they push the policies within the Democratic caucus that we’re going to have to defend,” Gonzalez added. “A lot of these policies that obviously I don’t agree with and would be very difficult for me to sell to people in South Texas, and I don’t intend to sell them, because I don’t believe in most of them myself.”
As for his own reelection, Gonzalez was confident he could still win despite any GOP attacks linking him to the DSA: “I’ve been around long enough that people don’t see me as a socialist. In fact, I get beat up by socialists.”
This story has been updated with additional details.
CNN’s Manu Raju and Alison Main contributed to this report.
They mispell his name as “Madmani” in one paragraph and have no way to submit a correction 🤦
Rather than meeting voters where they are, leadership dems plot to suppress would-be future leaders. Same playbook they used on Bernie in 2020.
Let’s hope they don’t get a say.
The Democratic Party is a private institution that is not obligated to follow the will of their voters. If their divergence from national policy polling is not enough to prove that, it was stated directly by their lawyers during the lawsuits related to their suppression of the Bernie Sanders campaign.
I absolutely agree. I want to be clear. I hope the DNC gets no say on the future of the American left. They fumbled it.
The DNC exists largely to block the will of the voters, especially anything even vaguely leftish.











