• Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    You got him with a 2 year olds defensive argument.

    No I’m not

    Where’s the “I’m rubber your glue…”

    Or “nuh uh”

    /s

      • BillyClark@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        You are the one who made the original incorrect assertion without evidence. That which is asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.

          • BillyClark@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            My statement was not an assertion of provable fact like yours was, but a method for ensuring that people can participate in debates against people who use bad faith tactics like you use.

            I am blocking you after I submit this comment.

            • Pinto, the Bean@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              since you want to be a little debate-pervert, let’s do it.

              Coming from null is hilarious, is he genuinely this stupid and dense or just pretending to be a moron?

            • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              Lol alright, since you want to be a little debate-pervert, let’s do it.

              Here’s your positive claim (assertion of provable fact):

              Being a part of an active case is completely separate from being classified.

              Here is your evidence for it: