The democratic socialist Melat Kiros unseated the long-serving US representative Diana DeGette in Colorado’s primary elections held on Tuesday, the latest in a string of high-profile victories for the party’s insurgent left.

The Associated Press reported that Kiros had defeated DeGette for the Democratic nomination in the deep-blue first congressional district centered on Denver. Kiros’s triumph came a week after New York voters unseated two Democratic congressional incumbents and replaced a third who was retiring with candidates who had campaigned on standing up to Israel amid accusations that it was carrying out a genocide in Gaza.

  • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    This started as a ripple in New York and we are now riding a wave of change. Hopefully this will become an unstoppable tsunami across the nation.

  • BillCheddar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    For what it’s worth, the late 80s to early 90s Republicans were as useless to Americans as the establishment democrats are to the left.

    The conservatives that overthrew those establishment people and took control of the Republican Party (Newt Gingrich and the rest of his scumbag traitors) did so by running conservative primary candidates against sitting, long-time congressmen…and winning. They also refused to wait in line, and ran for leadership positions (Speaker, Maj Leader, Whip, and committee chairs) and won those, too.

    They were also called insurgents at the time.

    We really should be using the 1994 model. Pick 10 simple things we can all (70%+) agree on, and all democrats, left or center, run on the platform.

    Stuff like “No corruption” “No more corporate elites bribing Congress” “No more bribes for the Supreme Court” etc. Don’t get into the controversial stuff. Just pick the easy stuff, like “Everyone should get to fucking eat food and have medicine”

    You’ll see what an insurgency can do with that simple model.

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I dunno man you’re asking an awful lot… :P

        Jokes aside- elections are supposed to find the best of us to represent the rest. It really shouldn’t be that hard to find someone who’s a. not into raping 14yo’s, b, frowns on genocide, and c. has basic administrative/leadership skills.

        And yet…

        • radiofreebc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          When corporations are considered people, and can donate to political campaigns, real people don’t matter. Citizens United destroyed America…Trump is just a symptom of that system.

    • ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Fuck it, the only question you need to ask these candidates are “Is Israel committing genocide in Gaza?” That answer alone will tell you the other 9 things.

  • MochiGoesMeow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    This stuff has me hyped. I feel awful because Im from District 5 and didnt realize Reagan was the progressive desired candidate. Imo both Killin and Reagan ran weak platforms for my district.

    All I heard from them is “im a veteran”.

    On Killins website she had a goal of overturning Citizens United which peaked my interest in her. Reagan had no prominent language on his site with the same goal. I hope my district gets better DSA candidates in the future.

    But im learning that she may just be another corporate democrat?

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    In a country where half the citizens are morons it will become increasingly more important for our candidates to focus on boots on the ground campaigning and leveraging heavily on social media. Our news outlets are so biased it’s borderline criminal what we allow them to get away with in the name of “journalism”

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    She was fired from her job for opposing genocide and supporting student protestors. Take that shitrael!

  • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    15 term incumbency?!? Correct me if I’m wrong, but if each term is 4 years long, that makes 60 years, correct?

    Why would anybody be in office that long?

    • scutiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Remember when Jan 6th happened and all you would hear on the news is insurgency this and insurgency that? This is how they devalue the meaning of the words used against them. Now everything we don’t like is an insurgency and what happened on Jan 6th was a nothingburger.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        That was a literal armed uprising attempting to overthrow the government. “Insurgency” is a perfectly valid term. What else do you call it when a mob of people engages in open rebellion?

        • luciferofastora@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Their point was that, by using the term for far less severe things, the media are devaluing it. The term is valid for the violent mob, but not for the swing in votes they’re using it for.

    • stickly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Tbh pretty accurate to the definition of the word. They’re winning in opposition to DNC authority despite all efforts to suppress them.

      • trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Oh gee, I dunno. This term is being applied to a political party running a legal campaign. I can tell you without a doubt, they are referring to the more extreme definition of insurgency. Not just a rebellious group of people but an armed group of people who wish to accomplish their goals through violence. They are swapping out the term radical for terrorist, which is a common gop tactic.

        I live here. There’s more guns than people. They are already on path to justify killing people for holding political opinion. Don’t be fuckin’ daft. You realize what you’re playing devil’s advocate for, right?

        • GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Not only that, but there’s already a term for that wing of the party: progressives. “Insurgent Left” is clearly a manufactured term concocted with the sole purpose of portraying progressives as dangerous, lawless extremists.

  • fireweed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Diana DeGette was defeated by someone as old as her incumbency.

    Love to see it. This is what should happen when you don’t pass the baton.

  • DeckPacker@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    standing up to Israel amid accusations that it was carrying out a genocide in Gaza.

    Yeah, shure Guardian, these are just “accusations” from crazy leftists.