• Miller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Those companies are not trying to make a profit they are trying to make a cheap workforce for the rich that wont unionise or expect basic human rights.

    • Mirshe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      There is also a growing cadre of these people who, I think, truly and deeply believe Peter Thiel’s hype about making a godlike super AI. Silicon Valley has been due for a religious awakening for years, and a techno-god that you can, theoretically, entreat with personally from the safety of your browser window? It’s tailor-made. At the very least, I feel like a lot of them have fallen into Pascal’s Wager about the whole thing, and that’s enough for them to devote time and energy and the limitless money they can beg or borrow to this.

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        I feel like a lot of them have fallen into Pascal’s Wager about the whole thing

        Funnily enough, you just described the Zizians. There’s a really good 4-part series of Behind the Bastards on them if you’re interested

        • Mirshe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m familiar, but I think there’s a lot of less extreme thought along the same lines throughout especially the C-levels and presidential classes. It’s gone beyond being a selling point and started into being a full-on belief because they’ve been selling the lie so long.

    • T. Hex@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m a little more cynical. I think the AI companies are making a fortune selling the fiction that human workers can be replaced.

      Megacorps invest for the short-term gains (wage suppression via layoffs that are spun to be a positive thing) and avoids short-term losses (holdouts may lose investors because AI is hip).

      • Miller@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        To my mind that is not more cynical, it is just a layer of grift on top, like scum. The real cynicism is the misanthropy of betting against humanity.

    • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Imo it’s all for the government surveillance state. They already have terabytes upon terabytes of data, they just can’t really use it. But an AI that could sift through all that shit in 5 minutes? Sounds great.

      But I suppose both paths lead to AI companies getting bailed out.

    • Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      They are so fixated on this that they are totally blind to that even if this were so it would remove the whole foundation of business: having customers able to pay, at all.

    • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      My concern is a mass depopulation when there are sufficient robo-slaves to take up the slack of maintaining society and producing technological progress. Although it’ll likely be temporary. I’m fairly sure humans when digitized will grow in number or similarly when we start space exploration and colonization in earnest. Without FTL some faction could always just go somewhere else if they want to do society another way.