well I mean yeah, they probably used something like the Chewbacca defense legal tactic. There’s no irrefutable defense against just making shit up until it sounds bad enough.
The democracy has been a joke for some time but now that they know they can do whatever with out consequences it’s pretty much done.
Grand juries will indict a ham sandwich. The prosecution is Trump’s DOJ, they 100% work for the administration. They also have a history of lying and violating the law when presenting to grand juries (where there is no defense allowed).
You have absolutely no idea how any of this works, so please do educate yourself before speaking.
I’m genuinely surprised still bc they couldn’t indict someone who threw a ham sandwich. DC must no longer be bothered by the sight of the national guard…
The prosecution presents the “evidence” to the grand jury. There is no defense against that, and the prosecution can present the “evidence” however they’d like.
They could claim that he shot twelve small children before taking out a pocket knife and slashing apart the reflecting pool, and the grand jury would just have to accept that.
They are not getting a trial or a defense or having all evidence presented and accounted for.
This is a political stunt, nothing more. Once he goes to court, this will get either tossed out, or if it goes to trial and an actual defense lawyer gets a hold of it, the case is over. There is no case. This is 100% optics.
As the person above you said, you need to educate yourself before speaking. Your ignorance is what fascists prey on.
So whenever someone doesn’t get indicted by the grand jury, it’s …… because the DOJ didn’t want them indicted? They just went through with it for funsies?
You are fundamentally not understanding how this all works and just repeating the one part you think is some sort of “gotcha”, like that makes you smart instead of what you’re really coming across as: a silly little kid/jackass who doesn’t even understand the basics of the US justice system and keeps antagonizing the people who do and are trying to explain it to you.
They also voted to indict Leticia James and a host of other politically motivated attacks the GOP and trump admin have thrown at people he wants to attack, only for those cases to, as was stated earlier, get thrown out of court day 1.
The grand jury that indicted him clearly think there’s enough evidence.
Trump and the administration have nothing to do with this.
Are you new? Or still in grade school?
Does the government vote to indict, or does a grand jury? Simple question.
well I mean yeah, they probably used something like the Chewbacca defense legal tactic. There’s no irrefutable defense against just making shit up until it sounds bad enough.
The democracy has been a joke for some time but now that they know they can do whatever with out consequences it’s pretty much done.
Grand juries will indict a ham sandwich. The prosecution is Trump’s DOJ, they 100% work for the administration. They also have a history of lying and violating the law when presenting to grand juries (where there is no defense allowed).
You have absolutely no idea how any of this works, so please do educate yourself before speaking.
I’m genuinely surprised still bc they couldn’t indict someone who threw a ham sandwich. DC must no longer be bothered by the sight of the national guard…
The prosecution didn’t indict him, the grand jury did.
Of course they did. He’s not a cop. You don’t know how grand juries work do you?
Are the grand jury all trump administration members?
The prosecution presents the “evidence” to the grand jury. There is no defense against that, and the prosecution can present the “evidence” however they’d like.
They could claim that he shot twelve small children before taking out a pocket knife and slashing apart the reflecting pool, and the grand jury would just have to accept that.
They are not getting a trial or a defense or having all evidence presented and accounted for.
This is a political stunt, nothing more. Once he goes to court, this will get either tossed out, or if it goes to trial and an actual defense lawyer gets a hold of it, the case is over. There is no case. This is 100% optics.
As the person above you said, you need to educate yourself before speaking. Your ignorance is what fascists prey on.
Again - The prosecution didn’t indict him, the grand jury did.
Dude, come on, take the L.
The prosecution doesn’t control if someone gets indicted. This is 100% fact.
If they get to present whatever they want as evidence then they certainly do. Don’t be a fool.
So whenever someone doesn’t get indicted by the grand jury, it’s …… because the DOJ didn’t want them indicted? They just went through with it for funsies?
You are fundamentally not understanding how this all works and just repeating the one part you think is some sort of “gotcha”, like that makes you smart instead of what you’re really coming across as: a silly little kid/jackass who doesn’t even understand the basics of the US justice system and keeps antagonizing the people who do and are trying to explain it to you.
Who indicted him - the trump administration, or the grand jury?
Who voted to indict?
They also voted to indict Leticia James and a host of other politically motivated attacks the GOP and trump admin have thrown at people he wants to attack, only for those cases to, as was stated earlier, get thrown out of court day 1.
The same will happen here.
Now sit back down.
Leticia James clearly committed mortgage fraud.