Cleveland's Flock Safety cameras kept recording after a 3-1 council vote killed the $250,000 contract, raising questions about who controls city surveillance.
If you mean “a laser that melts down the Flock camera into a steaming puddle”, then I’d agree. But if you mean “a laser that kills a CCD chip”, then no.
I’d be careful with that. Not sure how likely it is that the beam reflects and messes up ur eyes.
So there is a country with more guns than inhabitants, and they are afraid of a f-ing laser?
I would argue strong lasers are more dangerous than guns on average.
Depends on the definition of “strong”.
If you mean “a laser that melts down the Flock camera into a steaming puddle”, then I’d agree. But if you mean “a laser that kills a CCD chip”, then no.