

What’s in the bag, an SS banner and a .45 caliber pistol?


What’s in the bag, an SS banner and a .45 caliber pistol?


They know they can’t achieve meaningful objectives anymore so they focus efforts on simply killing Ukrainians and their supporters wherever possible. Men, women, children, they don’t care.


“Ethnic unity” is honestly a creative, if chilling, euphemism for genocide.
I would remember how China treats minorities internally if and when they take the mantle of global superpower and start pursuing global goals. I’d expect a return of East India Company-style exploitation and cruelty.


The stock trucks these days are bad enough.
Aftermarket lift kits for those trucks should be not be legal on the street. Those should be getting impounded on sight, but their redneck owners would probably start shooting cops if that happened so it won’t.


It ran for me with no tinkering when I bought it on sale a week ago.


Yeah. Probably had to worry about illegal snatch and grabs too. It’s just ironic that he had to turn to autocrats who use much of the same tactics he warned about.
Of course our views on Russia in 2013 were quite different to what they are now, but we always kind of knew they were a mafia state with varying levels of dedication to “playing along” on the world stage.


I dislike that he pursued asylum in Russia and I think that doing so potentially damages his credibility and motives. But what he did was important nonetheless.


1 of those 2 says only Trump can save it (by becoming dictator), so it’s not like we’re all pulling in the same direction.


If you need real confidentiality, encrypt the file on your own machine before uploading and share the key separately.
Wouldn’t people looking to host illegal content also just do this?
With that in mind, wouldn’t it be better to implement E2EE and have that user trust?
I get where you’re coming from, but that’s the unfortunate dilemma of file hosting, I’m afraid.


If they can paint a picture that it was not a sincere and genuine campaign and was in fact a ploy to pull votes away from the real candidate, sure.


These are the kinds of people that got shot in the small hours of the night circa 1946-47 if the post-war trials didn’t get to them first. People remember when you fuck with them like that.


How many criminals are taking along their microchipped pets to and from their crimes?
Rhetorical question I know. They simply do not want to allow dissidents and undesirables the freedom of movement.
Also, if you contribute to a project like this, you are a traitor and should be treated as such.


The people who would be upset about ICE or corruption or Epstein are already upset about it. Everyone else is a collaborator or a bystander that’s varying levels of contemptible. Nobody is really going to be swayed by “distractions.”
What I dislike most about this narrative is the idea that if we stayed locked in on Epstein or what have you, it would all be over.
Talking about problems doesn’t inherently fix them.
If 7 hours of 4k footage of Donald Trump raping children were aired on every major news network, what would the American people do differently from what they’re doing now? The correct answer for the vast, vast majority I think is “fuckall.” Anyone who’s paying attention can reasonably determine that Trump is a vicious sexual predator and client of trafficked women and children, but the only question that matters is “what is anyone going to do about it?”


It is basically the standard of US police training that when faced with any sort of resistance that could possibly conceivably cause harm to an officer, the first, second, and third options are to draw pistols and fire as many rounds as quickly as possible center mass with intent to kill.
Just watched a different police shooting involving a kidnapper and his victim in the back seat of a car. When the car was finally stopped, the kidnapper fired his pistol at cops and the cops responded by shooting the car roughly 150 times. The kidnapper lived, the victim died. Official reports and autopsies insist that the kidnapper executed her and she was not struck by police gunfire, which is obviously very convenient for the department’s PR and legal teams.


As cathartic as it is to shit on him, I could also see the benefit of massive positive gaslighting in this instance.
“Yeah, you won! I didn’t think you could pull it off, but you scored one of the biggest wins in American history! Job well done!”
He’s a fucking lunatic and a coward that physically cannot admit wrongdoing, so let him take his obscenely fake W in the poll of public opinion and walk away from Iran, stop the slaughter, and let the adults stabilize the situation.
You could call it enabling, sure, but I think he’s more dangerous when his ego is assaulted and challenged.


Insecure storage speaks to an overall blasé attitude towards firearms that’s for sure.


If you place a fired gun (contaminated with GSR) on a surface, particularly where you eat (kitchen counter, dining table) or on a fabric (couch, bed), it contaminates your living space and doesn’t really go away without cleaners that are effective on heavy metals.
Doesn’t even have to be “stored”. Cleaning your gun on the dining table, for example.


Wasn’t Tim Sweeney one of the smarmy fucks saying that Linux is a blatant cheating avenue and he had no interest in supporting it?


In a concurring opinion on a unanimous decision, Thomas said the court should “reexamine” the doctrine of judicial estoppel, which is a rule that bars litigants from taking contradictory positions in different court proceedings. He questioned its legitimacy and historical footing.
If the law isn’t even internally consistent then it’s not law at all, it’s the capricious whims of the ruling class.
Get fucked, Clarence.
It is not a fringe opinion in the American gun space that all firearms should be allowed anywhere, all existing gun laws should be dismantled, and any politician who tries to legislate guns should be tried for treason, or just shot.