In a concurring opinion on a unanimous decision, Thomas said the court should “reexamine” the doctrine of judicial estoppel, which is a rule that bars litigants from taking contradictory positions in different court proceedings. He questioned its legitimacy and historical footing.
If the law isn’t even internally consistent then it’s not law at all, it’s the capricious whims of the ruling class.
If the law isn’t even internally consistent then it’s not law at all, it’s the capricious whims of the ruling class.
Get fucked, Clarence.
Uncle Clarence.
Rapey Uncle Clarence
Uncle Clearance Thomas (no relation)
We have clearance, Clarence.
Why did I never consider this?
I don’t know. They both have reverse-vitiligo.
always has been
It’s to protect Trump.