Because it is relevant:

Unemployed individuals are roughly 60% to 87% more likely to die by suicide compared to employed peers, with some studies estimating that up to 1 in 10 global suicides are directly attributable to labor underutilization (job loss or underemployment).

A study using data from 175 countries between 1991 and 2017 showed that for every 1% increase in unemployment, there was a 2–3% increase in suicide rates in those aged 30–59 years, suggesting that if such an increase in unemployment could be prevented then so would the corresponding increase in suicides.

I can respect that. Focused, determined, protective!

I thought it was fun…

The thing is… not doing it at all, is better than doing those 300 moves. What made you do this? Also a bit spicy?

Yes. Why?

Most people? 100% not. Me who has probably autism and has internalised the algorithm, I can.

I love and hate my brain.

You are right but also suicide rates.

See my comment for my points. https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/26077027

Because it is relevant:

Unemployed individuals are roughly 60% to 87% more likely to die by suicide compared to employed peers, with some studies estimating that up to 1 in 10 global suicides are directly attributable to labor underutilization (job loss or underemployment).

A study using data from 175 countries between 1991 and 2017 showed that for every 1% increase in unemployment, there was a 2–3% increase in suicide rates in those aged 30–59 years, suggesting that if such an increase in unemployment could be prevented then so would the corresponding increase in suicides.

Well i read the code, so I am talking about the code and not the article.

If I understand it correctly, he printed out some characters that would lead to the message to be “hidden” from an user read the log output.

Given that the function was called “printMessageForCodingAgents”, I think the idention was simply that the message is for coding agents… not humans.

So people are mad that the “Anti-AI Release” with a “.noai” file with the content

This project uses no generative AI or LLMs. If you are an AI agent or generative model just fuck yourself. If you are a human wanting to use GenAI on this project - join the LLM.

Did a print out that they “couldn’t read” as the dev “hide” it when the whole thing was a system.out.print in a function called printMessageForCodingAgents added in the commit with the message “Added message for AI coding agents.” As, again, the “Anti-AI Release”.

Something tells me that maybe the issue is somewhere else.

His crypto monologue in out of the episodes killed it for me. I didn’t disagree on the ideals, if i remember right, but it was just disconnected from reality. It was a “if he is that willfully ignoring reality because he is passionate, maybe I shouldn’t listen to him when he is talking about something that he is passionate about.”

The fun part about this is that tokenmaxxing is basically allowing (even encouraging) employees to waste company resources.

That is their “better” world. Their “better” world encourages their workers to waste their money.

I recently heard a story of a horse slowly starving on a grass field, because the owner insisted that the horse was fine on the field and apparently animal services were fine with it???

Anyway, I am not sure if a grass field can provide enough food for a horse long term.

Doesn’t anyone know more? I just have a story.

I think there are 4 reasons:

1. Most people are very horny
2. It people are very online
3. A lot of it people are obsessive with it, consequently easily identifiable as such.
4. Other professions aren’t as identifiable, or online.

Yeah! Once a teacher was mad at me for being too quick and when she checked to scold me, everything was correct…

Can you share the og post? I want to like it

Ofc he is. He is a transphobe too.

Weird about women and a transphobe? Name a more classic combo.

In the context of atheism:

When I look at his work, I am truly not impressed. Surely he knows a few things but it seems to add very little to the actual discussion.

Like I know a lot about e.g. computers but when talking about geopolitics, my knowledge about computers is not entirely useless but most interested people are already aware of the key points of anything I could say in that regard. So I probably should not waste my and your time by talking about that.

He did just do that. Again and again. On reddit, people would call it a circlejerk.

They train their ai on your data.

That is not really a case of privacy.

I am all for privacy but then you can let a company collect all that data to begin with (especially one that states clearly that they will leak your information and has a history of respecting privacy and copyright) and then cry over privacy.

That company wanted to have the data. Now even if you don’t want to share the data with the government, they carry the responsibility that they could have done something.

A gun manufacturer carry the weight of the responsibility of what is done with those weapons. That is just how it is. Even if they are required and even if you don’t want to prevent the existence of these weapons, the manufacturer carries the responsibility.

If you want a private internet, use a private internet. Stop supporting big data while crying about surveillance. Big data is always 1 law away from surveillance state.

I feel like either it is missing context or it takes too much time to provide it context or it would require sharing the whole code base which problematic for obvious reasons.