Refuse to read? Do you have cameras in my house? Also did you read it? Just the diction alone is atrociously suffused with a particular intention. I think you would notice how it reads if it was on another topic, I get the sensation you’re not unbiased towards the content.

No person or country needs to do anything. I wasn’t really debating that point, but you’re free to start tangential discussions if you like. Now what people and countries do is the best representation of them. Anyone can talk, actions are what speak.

Ideally information by a source who gains nothing from the numbers being good or bad. It doesn’t take a genius to tell the difference between what would be on some sensationalized state owned news channel vs what is published as an academic paper for the global community.

Lol not unbiased is putting it very lightly. Compare this to how information is displayed on any reputable sources or in studies. This mostly reads like hardcore propaganda. Just compare it to propaganda from any country at any time period vs legitimate research.

So I’m just taking your word for all this or is there some proof of this from a source without an incentive to make the numbers good or bad? China famously doesn’t openly share accurate negative information about itself.

Removed by mod

Most the people I know personally want the conflicts in both locations (and others) to subside.

Is this a thing?. Most people I know personally are pretty for ending suffering for everyone.

Unfortunately there’s a lot of very wealthy people rednecks would very much dislike to be lumped in with who are also maga. Also there’s a growing contingent of loud and proud redneck democrats/ leftist. Living in the woods and smoking meth is for everyone these days.

Americans who are paying taxes that is. If you’re not paying any tax you’re probably not supporting much the US government is doing.

Nations aren’t the best for humans and their wellbeing. Religion is pretty bad and politics so far is only marginally better. The one structure that actually seems to be doing well is science.

In the US a stop as a yield is legal in twelve states, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Idaho, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Washington, and D.C.

Everyone else is just WebKit or Gecko

Has something changed over the last two years or does one have to be specifically not cis, white or living in a capitalist country to receive these downvotes?

You can use a terminal browser a la lynks2 or w3m

Two years later, how’s the switch been?

Yeah if your machine can be added to a botnet then it will be. Resistance is futile, we are Borg style.

That’s a fair additive although it can be difficult to define the boundaries. Particularly tech can have a far reaching influence and arguably global influence these days. If the scope of the policy is narrow then I can imagine that being functional, if the scope is potentially global then that may become an issue.

This is how most things are, particularly anything at a national or global scale.

Sidebar, this is how most things are, particularly oil prices. Suppliers and manufacturers take orders sometimes for years of future production. It’s not just AI and computer hardware, it’s essentially everything.

Calling democracy mob rule is really old. I would at least prefer representatives to be scientists or otherwise the most informed on the subject and policies they are deciding on. I would also prefer all policies to be tested to see if they actually create their desired outcomes. I would prefer the desired outcome to always be increasing human and environmental wellbeing.