In my experience, the ones who tell you unprompted that they’re vegan are usually relatively new to the diet and are more likely to be treating it as a short term fad diet than the more dedicated ethical vegans.
I’ve known people 10+ years vegan and they’re super healthy and active. So its really just that the fortifications in the US food system are targeted at non-vegans so you need to be more intentional about your diet as a vegan in the US.
So, um, what happened to the impeachment bill from early april? Still trickling down to the Judiciary comittee? I feel like it didn’t take this long for Clinton’s impeachment hearing…
For text classification? They might. There’s a million things they could be using. I’ve definitely seen just throwing ChatGPT at text and asking it to generate a label for tagging and classification, but its much cheaper to use fine tuned Roberta or some other encoder-only model. Both are LLMs using a transformer architecture, just one is more what we’re familiar with the other is more meant for text classification tasks.
ah, missed the voice recordings part, I can see an LLM for annotating those. I meant to emphasise this is separate from the LLM assistant and coding models that are the most visible to consumers right now.
The need to constantly show growth makes me wonder if it’s worth doing crazy stuff that tanks the business just to show growth by getting it out of the ditch back to where it was before.
I mean, some things just are. They’re not huge victories or tragic defeats.
How fragile do you think workers are? No shit a strike harms the bottom line of the company as a whole. That’s the whole point.
It’s incumbent on the unions and workers to decide if them getting shafted in contract negotiations is disproportionate to how the company is doing as a whole or if it’s just the company actually not being able to afford raises or benefits (is the money really not there or is it getting hoarded by management)
If the company is actually not doing well, then laying off some people and trying to right the ship is preferable to everyone losing their jobs if it goes under. When deciding to strike you’re weighing if it’s because of management greed or the company actually not being able to afford the additional benefits.
As it is currently employees only get the downside when the market is weak, they don’t get the upside. Stocks mitigate that problem.
This is just from 10% of profit. Management barely noticed financially.
Fyi, this is probably specialized models doing domain specific analysis, not a generative image or text model. I doubt you could find tune it enough on literature to automagically classify proteins.
Maybe this is a weird semantic difference.
If she lost more people by being hawkish and right leaning than she lost by being too liberal with social policies that nominally leaned left then that means she was too far right as that lost her more votes than her left leaning policies.
Both parties are pro genocide either here or abroad, but one at least has a sizeable wing that is actually opposed to foreign wars instead of just paying lip service to a supposed world order based on rule of law.
Vote for the candidate not the party.
AOC vs Rubio, you’re getting someone of Hispanic heritage whether you like it or not!
Many believe Harris lost in 2024 because voters viewed her as too progressive
What are they talking about
I miss the days when the executive’s online footprint was so small that whitehouse.com was grabbed by a porn site
Good call, more global unrest could result in another warehouse being burned down.
I just use the back of the toothbrush. I get ones that are textured.
I feel like my breath is bad if I don’t.
It’s not unknown if it’s effective…
someone from Mozilla put their name on a blog post saying they fixes 22 vulnerabilities and an upcoming patch fixes 200+
https://blog.mozilla.org/en/privacy-security/ai-security-zero-day-vulnerabilities/
This isn’t anthropic, they have no incentive to lie about how good the product is. They’re committing limited development resources to these fixes so would want them to be real problems.
It’s also definitely more than 0, the original mythos post disclosed a OpenBSD vulnerability that was patched and they disclosed more as hashes for unpatched vulnerabilities, basically signatures of either descriptions or exploit implementations, so when they fix and disclose the plain text ones we know the original post was telling the truth. The signatures are difficult to forge.
We also have a ton of 3rd party researchers looking at this stuff if they did forge those signatures and I haven’t seen any whistleblowers with access to the model saying it garbage. If you have any sources let me know, I would be interested in reading that.
My point is not to white knight for anthropic. They’re flaunting IP rights and driving up energy prices for personal profit, but that when you take a position and say something it should be for actual reasons, not just “I hate this company”
I understand why people are bandwagoning on Antropic, they’re certainly not a blameless company with negative societal, environmental, and economic impacts of the product they’re pushing.
This article is kind of dumb though, structurally, the headline and introductory paragraph are completely different issues. And the nothingburger framing is a straw man.
I don’t think anyone who has had access to the models and been able to write about it has claimed that it is better at humans at finding bugs, but most articles I’ve read from those people have said it is valuable because expert security researchers are a finite resource, they can only do so much manual poring over of large code bases and honestly that sounds like mind numbing work.
The value is not that its better than human security researchers, but that it doesn’t sleep and you can just spawn a bunch of them to look for stuff so a researcher is only reviewing and guiding agents instead of getting bogged down in the nitty gritty of scanning code bases.
The mozilla article a few days ago put it well, if it becomes easier to find bugs that generally benefits criminal elements who have a larger profit incentive to find a single zero-day over security researchers where it doesn’t matter how many zero-days they find, it only takes one to have a major incident.
I think the idea of responsible disclosure here is a good one if somewhat poorly executed with the model leak, and I don’t understand why its being mocked other than that people just see the letters AI and start hurling tomatoes. There’s plenty of targets in the IP theft and vibe coded garbage areas of AI, its counterproductive to attack them for doing the right thing.
If he is capable of hating genocide, what other hate does he hold in his heart?